HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. BRANDON BURNS and LANDON McKAY, 2020 SKQB 228
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | SCHERMAN J. |
| Citation | 2020 SKQB 228 |
| Date | 10 September 2020 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CR 257 of 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R. v. Martell,
...2015 SKQB 382, [Nguyen] (McMurtry J.); (c) R v Burns, 2020 SKQB 228 [Burns] (Scherman (d) R v Hansen, 2022 SKQB 34 [Hansen] (Robe......
-
Mostafa Altalibi Professional Corporation v Lorne S. Kamelchuk Professional Corporation,
...Courts have also noted that technology has improved. For example, in R v Burns, 2020 SKQB 228, where two witnesses testified by videoconferencing technology in a murder and attempted murder trial, the trial judge commented at paragraph 24, “As the technology for video evidence has im......
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. KIRK SEARS AND DYLAN LAMB, 2020 SKQB 239
...The Crown noted that this Court, in R v Burns and McKay, 2020 SKQB 228 [Burns] recently granted an application under s. 714.1 for two witnesses to testify by videoconferencing technology in a trial on charges of murder and attempted murder. In doing so, Sherman J., at para. 12, found ȁ......
-
R v PATRON,
...to appear by videoconference from another location in Canada. That decision considered and followed the approach set out in R v Burns, 2020 SKQB 228 [Burns], a decision of Scherman J. Burns was also cited in R v Gordon, 2021 SKQB 131, a decision of Tochor J. As was done in those decis......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R. v. Martell,
...2015 SKQB 382, [Nguyen] (McMurtry J.); (c) R v Burns, 2020 SKQB 228 [Burns] (Scherman (d) R v Hansen, 2022 SKQB 34 [Hansen] (Robe......
-
Mostafa Altalibi Professional Corporation v Lorne S. Kamelchuk Professional Corporation,
...Courts have also noted that technology has improved. For example, in R v Burns, 2020 SKQB 228, where two witnesses testified by videoconferencing technology in a murder and attempted murder trial, the trial judge commented at paragraph 24, “As the technology for video evidence has im......
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. KIRK SEARS AND DYLAN LAMB, 2020 SKQB 239
...The Crown noted that this Court, in R v Burns and McKay, 2020 SKQB 228 [Burns] recently granted an application under s. 714.1 for two witnesses to testify by videoconferencing technology in a trial on charges of murder and attempted murder. In doing so, Sherman J., at para. 12, found ȁ......
-
R v PATRON,
...to appear by videoconference from another location in Canada. That decision considered and followed the approach set out in R v Burns, 2020 SKQB 228 [Burns], a decision of Scherman J. Burns was also cited in R v Gordon, 2021 SKQB 131, a decision of Tochor J. As was done in those decis......
Request a trial to view additional results