Herold v Wassermann,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Caldwell,Leurer,Whitmore |
| Citation | 2022 SKCA 103 |
| Docket Number | CACV3871 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 20 September 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
The King v. Greenwood, 2024 FCA 33
...concerning the stay of class proceedings. The exercise of discretion should not be curtailed by rigid criteria: Herold v. Wassermann, 2022 SKCA 103 at para. 98, citing Leier v. Shumiatcher (No. 2), 1962 CanLII 330 (S.K. C.A.) at para. 2, 39 W.W.R. (N.S.) 446; Hamm v. Canada (Attorney Genera......
-
Larocque v Yahoo! Inc.,
...Ms. Larocque. III. ISSUES 20 A decision to grant or refuse a stay of an action involves the exercise of discretion: Herold v Wasserman, 2022 SKCA 103 at para 23, 473 DLR (4th) 281 [ Herold]. One basis for appellate intervention in a discretionary decision is “where the judge failed t......
2 cases
-
The King v. Greenwood, 2024 FCA 33
...concerning the stay of class proceedings. The exercise of discretion should not be curtailed by rigid criteria: Herold v. Wassermann, 2022 SKCA 103 at para. 98, citing Leier v. Shumiatcher (No. 2), 1962 CanLII 330 (S.K. C.A.) at para. 2, 39 W.W.R. (N.S.) 446; Hamm v. Canada (Attorney Genera......
-
Larocque v Yahoo! Inc.,
...Ms. Larocque. III. ISSUES 20 A decision to grant or refuse a stay of an action involves the exercise of discretion: Herold v Wasserman, 2022 SKCA 103 at para 23, 473 DLR (4th) 281 [ Herold]. One basis for appellate intervention in a discretionary decision is “where the judge failed t......