Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Products Ltd., (1969) 1 N.B.R.(2d) 483 (QB)
| Judge | Barry, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada) |
| Case Date | June 03, 1969 |
| Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
| Citations | (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 483 (QB) |
Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Prod. (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 483 (QB);
1 R.N.-B.(2e) 483
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Products Limited
Indexed As: Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Products Ltd.
Répertorié: Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Products Ltd.
New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
Barry, J.
June 3, 1969.
Summary:
Résumé:
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench granted application for an order for further examination for discovery before trial limited to questions ruled relevant and excluding any questions with respect to matters of law.
Practice - Topic 4413
Discovery - Order for examination for discovery - Order for further examination - Application for an order for further examination - Order 31A of New Brunswick Rules of Court - Statement of purpose and existing practice (New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench).
Cases Noticed:
Saint John Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. Ltd. v. Craig, 1 N.B.R.(2d) 187, folld.
Statutes Noticed:
Rules of Supreme Court, Order 31A.
Counsel:
D.M. Gillis, Q.C., for plaintiff;
E. Neil McKelvey, Q.C., for defendant.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mercer v. Cronin, (2014) 426 N.B.R.(2d) 202 (TD)
...Inns Ltd. et al. (1995), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 374; 434 A.P.R. 374 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6]. Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Products Ltd. (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 483 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Senechal v. Muskoka (Municipality), 2005 CanLII 11575 (Ont. Sup. Ct. Master), refd to. [para. 15]. Corrier v.......
-
Diadamo v. Arsenault et al., 2005 NBQB 82
...of the facts and issues relevant to the subject matter of the action prior to trial. [9] In Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Prod (1969), 1 N.B.R. (2d) 483, the Court granted an order for further examination for discovery before trial limited to the questions ruled relevant and excluding any ......
-
Debly et al. v. Cook, (2007) 319 N.B.R.(2d) 205 (TD)
...Ltd. et al. (1995), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 374; 434 A.P.R. 374 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14]. Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Products Ltd. (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 483; 1969 CarswellNB 71 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Doucet et al. v. Spielo Manufacturing Inc. et al. (2006), 300 N.B.R.(2d) 169; 782 A.P.R. 169 ......
-
Mercer v. Cronin, (2014) 426 N.B.R.(2d) 202 (TD)
...Inns Ltd. et al. (1995), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 374; 434 A.P.R. 374 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6]. Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Products Ltd. (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 483 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Senechal v. Muskoka (Municipality), 2005 CanLII 11575 (Ont. Sup. Ct. Master), refd to. [para. 15]. Corrier v.......
-
Diadamo v. Arsenault et al., 2005 NBQB 82
...of the facts and issues relevant to the subject matter of the action prior to trial. [9] In Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Prod (1969), 1 N.B.R. (2d) 483, the Court granted an order for further examination for discovery before trial limited to the questions ruled relevant and excluding any ......
-
Debly et al. v. Cook, (2007) 319 N.B.R.(2d) 205 (TD)
...Ltd. et al. (1995), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 374; 434 A.P.R. 374 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14]. Hesler v. Enamel & Heating Products Ltd. (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 483; 1969 CarswellNB 71 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Doucet et al. v. Spielo Manufacturing Inc. et al. (2006), 300 N.B.R.(2d) 169; 782 A.P.R. 169 ......