Hi-Seas Marine Ltd. v. Boelman, [2006] B.C.T.C. 488 (SC)
| Judge | Davies, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 02, 2006 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2006] B.C.T.C. 488 (SC);2006 BCSC 488 |
Hi-Seas Marine Ltd. v. Boelman, [2006] B.C.T.C. 488 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.046
Hi-Seas Marine Ltd. (plaintiff) v. Willem Gerard Boelman (defendant)
(S033659; 2006 BCSC 488)
Indexed As: Hi-Seas Marine Ltd. v. Boelman
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Davies, J.
March 27, 2006.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Arbitration - Topic 995
The submission - Parties - General - See paragraphs 46 to 51.
Arbitration - Topic 5510
The award - General - Admissibility in subsequent action - See paragraphs 52 to 68.
Company Law - Topic 312
Nature of corporations - Lifting the corporate veil - Principals - "Directing mind and will" of company - See paragraphs 69 to 110.
Company Law - Topic 4187
Directors - Liability of directors - For breach of trust - See paragraphs 69 to 110.
Equity - Topic 3646
Fiduciary or confidential relationships - Breach of fiduciary relationship - By director or officer of company - See paragraphs 69 to 110.
Estoppel - Topic 378
Estoppel by record (res judicata) - Res judicata as a bar to subsequent proceedings - Parties - See paragraphs 46 to 51.
Estoppel - Topic 383
Estoppel by record (res judicata) - Res judicata as a bar to subsequent proceedings - In arbitration proceedings - See paragraphs 46 to 51.
Estoppel - Topic 387
Estoppel by record (res judicata) - Res judicata as a bar to subsequent proceedings - Matters or claims available in prior proceedings - See paragraphs 46 to 51.
Counsel:
M.L. Smith, for the plaintiff;
D.G. Cowper, Q.C., and S. Elliott, for the defendant.
This action was heard on January 31 to February 2, 2006, before Davies, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 27, 2006.
Please Note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bhangoo v. Soon et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 826 (SC)
...not in the circumstances import principles of partnership law. [39] The Remaining Defendants rely upon Hi-Seas Marine Ltd. v. Boelman , 2006 BCSC 488, aff'd 2007 BCCA 137 [ Hi-Seas ] and Edgington v. Mulek Estate , 2008 BCCA 505, 86 B.C.L.R. (4th) 78 [ Edgington ]. In Hi-Seas , Mr. Justice ......
-
Hi-Seas Marine Ltd. v. Boelman, 2007 BCCA 137
...comprehensive reasons in which he fully addressed the positions taken on both sides and explained why Hi Seas' claim could not succeed: 2006 BCSC 488. On this appeal, Hi-Seas contends that the judge was in error but does not in my view point to anything of consequence that it can properly b......
-
Bhangoo v. Soon et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 826 (SC)
...not in the circumstances import principles of partnership law. [39] The Remaining Defendants rely upon Hi-Seas Marine Ltd. v. Boelman , 2006 BCSC 488, aff'd 2007 BCCA 137 [ Hi-Seas ] and Edgington v. Mulek Estate , 2008 BCCA 505, 86 B.C.L.R. (4th) 78 [ Edgington ]. In Hi-Seas , Mr. Justice ......
-
Hi-Seas Marine Ltd. v. Boelman, 2007 BCCA 137
...comprehensive reasons in which he fully addressed the positions taken on both sides and explained why Hi Seas' claim could not succeed: 2006 BCSC 488. On this appeal, Hi-Seas contends that the judge was in error but does not in my view point to anything of consequence that it can properly b......