Hicks v. Belknap,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | DeWitt-Van Oosten,Grauer,Marchand |
| Citation | 2022 BCCA 292 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA47510; CA47512 |
| Date | 26 August 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 172,
...damages of $55,000 to the plaintiff. Both parties appealed the decision and both appeals were dismissed in August 2022: Hicks v. Belknap, 2022 BCCA 292. 2 The parties appear before me now on the issue of 3 The plaintiff seeks the following orders: 1. that R. 14–1(f) does not apply to......
-
Belknap v Hicks,
...damages of $55,000 to the plaintiff. Both parties appealed the decision and both appeals were dismissed in August 2022: Hicks v. Belknap, 2022 BCCA 292. 2 The parties appear before me now on the issue of 3 The plaintiff seeks the following orders: 1. that R. 14–1(f) does not apply to......
2 cases
-
2023 BCSC 172,
...damages of $55,000 to the plaintiff. Both parties appealed the decision and both appeals were dismissed in August 2022: Hicks v. Belknap, 2022 BCCA 292. 2 The parties appear before me now on the issue of 3 The plaintiff seeks the following orders: 1. that R. 14–1(f) does not apply to......
-
Belknap v Hicks,
...damages of $55,000 to the plaintiff. Both parties appealed the decision and both appeals were dismissed in August 2022: Hicks v. Belknap, 2022 BCCA 292. 2 The parties appear before me now on the issue of 3 The plaintiff seeks the following orders: 1. that R. 14–1(f) does not apply to......