Higgins Co. v. McNabb, (1979) 2 Sask.R. 119 (CA)

JudgeCulliton, C.J.S., Woods and Brownridge, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Case DateNovember 21, 1979
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations(1979), 2 Sask.R. 119 (CA)

Higgins Co. v. McNabb (1979), 2 Sask.R. 119 (CA)

MLB headnote and full text

Higgins Co. Ltd., Trustee v. McNabb

(No. 6975)

Indexed As: Higgins Co. v. McNabb

Saskatchewan Court of Appeal

Culliton, C.J.S., Woods and Brownridge, JJ.A.

November 21, 1979.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Execution - Topic 748

Exemptions - Homestead property, Exemptions Act, s. 2(1) - On May 12, 1977, a man declared bankruptcy - On May 25, 1977, the man agreed that his trustee in bankruptcy sell his interest in his matrimonial home - The trustee claimed that the proceeds of sale of the home were not exempt under s. 2(1) of the Exemptions Act because the man "voluntarily" agreed to the sale of the home - The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held that the proceeds of sale of the home were exempt because the man agreed to the sale on the assumption that he would receive his exemption and, accordingly, the man did not waive his right to claim his exemption - See paragraph 21.

Cases Noticed:

Re Henwood (1962-63), 40 W.W.R. 81, refd to. [para. 6].

Re Demaurez (1900-1904), 5 Terr. L.R. 84, refd to. [para. 11].

Massey-Harris Co. v. Schram (1900-1904), 5 Terr. L.R. 338, refd to. [para. 11].

Regal Distributors Limited v. Freele, [1931] 1 W.W.R. 299, refd to. [para. 14].

Re Williams, 40 W.W.R. 81, refd to. [para. 16].

Purdy v. Colton (1908), 1 S.L.R. 288, refd to. [para. 19].

Statutes Noticed:

Bankruptcy Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. B-3, sect. 47(b) [para. 7].

Exemptions Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. E-14, sect. 2(1)10, sect. 2(1)11 [para. 8].

Counsel:

C.G. Morris, for the appellant, trustee;

M.F. Mulatz, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard by CULLITON, C.J.S., WOODS and BROWNRIDGE, JJ.A., of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, on May 10, 1978.

The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by BROWNRIDGE, J.A., on November 21, 1979.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 practice notes
  • Charles v Hernandez Becerra, 2016 SKCA 163
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 21, 2016
    ...Re; Touche Ross Limited v First City Trust Company, 17 DLR (4th) 554 (Sask CA) [Neuls]). [24] Thus, in Higgins Company v McNabb (1979), 2 Sask R 119 (CA) [McNabb], the Court did not need to consider itself confined to a definition of “forced sale” as being one mandated by a court order. I......
  • Investors Group Trust Co. v. Eckhoff et al., 2008 SKCA 18
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 4, 2007
    ...288, refd to. [para. 26]. Tripp v. Gray et al., [1978] 4 W.W.R. 543 (Sask. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 26]. Higgins Co. v. McNabb (1979), 2 Sask.R. 119 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 26]. Neuls (Bankrupts), Re; Touche Ross Ltd. v. First City Trust Co. et al. (1985), 37 Sask.R. 60 (C.A.), refd to. ......
  • Hamm v. Metz et al., 2002 SKCA 11
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 28, 2001
    ...to. [para. 39]. Popoff v. Dootoff, [1937] 2 W.W.R. 186 (Sask. C.A.), refd to. [para. 39]. Higgins Co. v. McNabb, [1980] 2 W.W.R. 385; 2 Sask.R. 119 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Neuls (Bankrupts), Re; Touche Ross Ltd. v. First City Trust Co. et al. (1985), 37 Sask.R. 60 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 40......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • Charles v Hernandez Becerra, 2016 SKCA 163
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 21, 2016
    ...Re; Touche Ross Limited v First City Trust Company, 17 DLR (4th) 554 (Sask CA) [Neuls]). [24] Thus, in Higgins Company v McNabb (1979), 2 Sask R 119 (CA) [McNabb], the Court did not need to consider itself confined to a definition of “forced sale” as being one mandated by a court order. I......
  • Investors Group Trust Co. v. Eckhoff et al., 2008 SKCA 18
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 4, 2007
    ...288, refd to. [para. 26]. Tripp v. Gray et al., [1978] 4 W.W.R. 543 (Sask. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 26]. Higgins Co. v. McNabb (1979), 2 Sask.R. 119 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 26]. Neuls (Bankrupts), Re; Touche Ross Ltd. v. First City Trust Co. et al. (1985), 37 Sask.R. 60 (C.A.), refd to. ......
  • Hamm v. Metz et al., 2002 SKCA 11
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 28, 2001
    ...to. [para. 39]. Popoff v. Dootoff, [1937] 2 W.W.R. 186 (Sask. C.A.), refd to. [para. 39]. Higgins Co. v. McNabb, [1980] 2 W.W.R. 385; 2 Sask.R. 119 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Neuls (Bankrupts), Re; Touche Ross Ltd. v. First City Trust Co. et al. (1985), 37 Sask.R. 60 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 40......
  • Todd (Bankrupt), Re, 2009 SKQB 120
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • March 31, 2009
    ...895; 2004 BCSC 895, refd to. [para. 35]. Kirkpatrick, Re (1984), 35 Sask.R. 97 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 37]. Higgins Co. v. McNabb (1979), 2 Sask.R. 119 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Balkwill (Bankrupt), Re (1999), 181 Sask.R. 48 (Q.B. Bktcy. Registrar), refd to. [para. 42]. Biblow (Bankrupt), Re ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT