Hignell v. Leeb et al, 2018 SKQB 330
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Tholl |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 330 |
| Date | 28 November 2018 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | QBG 613 of 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Regehr v. Keep,
...now of The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan) defined the appropriate standard of care of an investment advisor in Hignell v Leeb, 2018 SKQB 330 at para 161 [Leeb]. Citing Cunningham v Wiltzen, 2017 ABCA 185, [2017] 11 WWR 22 [Cunningham] which in turn referred to Northey-Taylor v Casey, 200......
-
Wu v. Ma,
...who acts as a fiduciary. Breaches of such a fiduciary obligation results in the fiduciary being personally liable (see Hignell v. Leeb, 2018 SKQB 330 at [249] I conclude that Mr. Ma is liable to Ms. Wu for breaching his fiduciary obligations. SOF is vicariously l......
2 cases
-
Regehr v. Keep,
...now of The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan) defined the appropriate standard of care of an investment advisor in Hignell v Leeb, 2018 SKQB 330 at para 161 [Leeb]. Citing Cunningham v Wiltzen, 2017 ABCA 185, [2017] 11 WWR 22 [Cunningham] which in turn referred to Northey-Taylor v Casey, 200......
-
Wu v. Ma,
...who acts as a fiduciary. Breaches of such a fiduciary obligation results in the fiduciary being personally liable (see Hignell v. Leeb, 2018 SKQB 330 at [249] I conclude that Mr. Ma is liable to Ms. Wu for breaching his fiduciary obligations. SOF is vicariously l......