Holden v Holden
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Wakeling |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 341 |
| Date | 17 October 2022 |
| Docket Number | 2203-0099AC |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 practice notes
-
Astolfi v. Stone Creek Resorts Inc.
...was not provided by Astolfi) counsel cannot be a witness and advocate in the same proceeding on an important issue: Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at para 50 (footnote 37); RT v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 655 at para 32; RM v JS, 2013 ABCA 441 at para 28. Accordingly, counsel should not purport to ......
-
Bank of Montreal v. Luciano
...with the passage of time and lengthy delays are much more likely to involve serious prejudice: Travis at para 30; Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at para [55] The potential for serious prejudice to BMO in this case was not materially explored in argument. If there is a lost opportunity to ha......
-
Jose v Baby
...Ltd, 2015 ABCA 201 at paras 20-24, 602 AR 105. A hopeless proceeding in this Court is not in the interest of any party: Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at paras 22, 62, 87, [2022] AJ No 1224 (QL) citing various [12] Applying either the Cairns extension test or the restoration test to the cir......
-
Nkusi v Patricia C. Tiffen Professional Corporation
...ABCA 238 at para 5, [2015] AJ No 770 (QL); Scarlett v Wang, 2019 ABCA 72 at paras 28-29, [2019] AJ No 208; Li at para 9; Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at paras 55-68, [2022] AJ No 1224 [27] Time limits are of fundamental importance to proper functioning of the Court. They are to must be re......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
Astolfi v. Stone Creek Resorts Inc.
...was not provided by Astolfi) counsel cannot be a witness and advocate in the same proceeding on an important issue: Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at para 50 (footnote 37); RT v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 655 at para 32; RM v JS, 2013 ABCA 441 at para 28. Accordingly, counsel should not purport to ......
-
Bank of Montreal v. Luciano
...with the passage of time and lengthy delays are much more likely to involve serious prejudice: Travis at para 30; Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at para [55] The potential for serious prejudice to BMO in this case was not materially explored in argument. If there is a lost opportunity to ha......
-
Jose v Baby
...Ltd, 2015 ABCA 201 at paras 20-24, 602 AR 105. A hopeless proceeding in this Court is not in the interest of any party: Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at paras 22, 62, 87, [2022] AJ No 1224 (QL) citing various [12] Applying either the Cairns extension test or the restoration test to the cir......
-
Nkusi v Patricia C. Tiffen Professional Corporation
...ABCA 238 at para 5, [2015] AJ No 770 (QL); Scarlett v Wang, 2019 ABCA 72 at paras 28-29, [2019] AJ No 208; Li at para 9; Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at paras 55-68, [2022] AJ No 1224 [27] Time limits are of fundamental importance to proper functioning of the Court. They are to must be re......
Get Started for Free
