Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 304
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman,The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 304 |
| Docket Number | CA46715 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 06 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.,
...legislative intent and choose an interpretation that supports the law’s validity: Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 304 at para. 29, citing Reference re The Farm Products Marketing Act, [1957] S.C.R. 198 at 255, 1957 CanLII 1 and Siemens v. Manitoba (Attorney ......
-
Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...proceeding. [3] Ms. Holland appealed that decision. In reasons reported at 2020 BCCA 304, the Court of Appeal found that a petition seeking judicial review pursuant to the Judicial Review Procedure Act , R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 241 , w......
-
Wood (Re),
...I subsequently requested supplemental submissions on the possible applicability of Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 304 [Holland], to the circumstances of the case. The parties responded and I received the last of those submissions on March 15, Application for Leave......
-
Wood (Re),
...6 I subsequently requested supplemental submissions on the possible applicability of Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 304 [ Holland], to the circumstances of the case. The parties responded and I received the last of those submissions on March 15, Application for Le......
4 cases
-
British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.,
...legislative intent and choose an interpretation that supports the law’s validity: Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 304 at para. 29, citing Reference re The Farm Products Marketing Act, [1957] S.C.R. 198 at 255, 1957 CanLII 1 and Siemens v. Manitoba (Attorney ......
-
Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...proceeding. [3] Ms. Holland appealed that decision. In reasons reported at 2020 BCCA 304, the Court of Appeal found that a petition seeking judicial review pursuant to the Judicial Review Procedure Act , R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 241 , w......
-
Wood (Re),
...I subsequently requested supplemental submissions on the possible applicability of Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 304 [Holland], to the circumstances of the case. The parties responded and I received the last of those submissions on March 15, Application for Leave......
-
Wood (Re),
...6 I subsequently requested supplemental submissions on the possible applicability of Holland v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 304 [ Holland], to the circumstances of the case. The parties responded and I received the last of those submissions on March 15, Application for Le......