Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Brongers |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 28 |
| Date | 11 January 2022 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S209822 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 83,
...A helpful summary of the meaning of patent unreasonableness is set out in para. 25 of Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli, 2022 BCSC 28 [ Hollyburn Properties]: [25] As the ATA does not define patent unreasonableness as it applies to a tribunal's factual or legal findings, however,......
-
Li v Virk,
...A helpful summary of the meaning of patent unreasonableness is set out in para. 25 of Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli, 2022 BCSC 28 [ Hollyburn Properties]: [25] As the ATA does not define patent unreasonableness as it applies to a tribunal's factual or legal findings, however,......
-
2023 BCSC 496,
...standard applies to all substantive aspects of an arbitrator's decision. 39 In Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli, 2022 BCSC 28 [ Hollyburn], Justice Brongers distilled earlier the jurisprudence regarding the meaning of the patently unreasonable standard of review: [25] As the ATA......
-
Ma v Thorsen,
...standard applies to all substantive aspects of an arbitrator's decision. 39 In Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli, 2022 BCSC 28 [ Hollyburn], Justice Brongers distilled earlier the jurisprudence regarding the meaning of the patently unreasonable standard of review: [25] As the ATA......
4 cases
-
2023 BCSC 83,
...A helpful summary of the meaning of patent unreasonableness is set out in para. 25 of Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli, 2022 BCSC 28 [ Hollyburn Properties]: [25] As the ATA does not define patent unreasonableness as it applies to a tribunal's factual or legal findings, however,......
-
Li v Virk,
...A helpful summary of the meaning of patent unreasonableness is set out in para. 25 of Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli, 2022 BCSC 28 [ Hollyburn Properties]: [25] As the ATA does not define patent unreasonableness as it applies to a tribunal's factual or legal findings, however,......
-
2023 BCSC 496,
...standard applies to all substantive aspects of an arbitrator's decision. 39 In Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli, 2022 BCSC 28 [ Hollyburn], Justice Brongers distilled earlier the jurisprudence regarding the meaning of the patently unreasonable standard of review: [25] As the ATA......
-
Ma v Thorsen,
...standard applies to all substantive aspects of an arbitrator's decision. 39 In Hollyburn Properties Limited v. Staehli, 2022 BCSC 28 [ Hollyburn], Justice Brongers distilled earlier the jurisprudence regarding the meaning of the patently unreasonable standard of review: [25] As the ATA......