Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice A. Woolley
Citation2020 ABQB 149
Docket Number1001 11801
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date27 February 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Serinus Energy Plc v SysGen Solutions Group Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 7, 2023
    ...v Smith at 137–38; Lac Minerals at 595; Roorda v MacIntyre, 2010 ABCA 156 at para 16; Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149 at para 140; Ruel v Rebonne, 2022 ABQB 271 at para 81. The terms of a contract can create the fiduciary relationship: Indutech at paras 29 ......
  • Bacanora Minerals Ltd v Orr-Ewing (Estate),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 23, 2021
    ...This Court had recent cause to summarize the law on discoverability in Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149 at paras The claimant must know sufficient facts on which an action could be brought, or those facts must be discoverable: Riddell Kurczaba Architecture Engineering ......
  • Prairiesky Royalty Ltd v Yangarra Resources Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 6, 2023
    ...that clearly connote an intention to create an interest in land (IFP Technologies at para 89; Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149 at para 109). To rebut the presumption of an interest in land arising from the plain wording of a royalty agreement, the remaining indicia and......
  • Signalta Resources Limited v Canadian Natural Resources Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 24, 2023
    ...was producing non-solution gas. [719]       CNRL also relies on Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149, particularly Wooley J’s comments about the “public availability” of the law at para 278. However, Hudson King is also di......
4 cases
  • Serinus Energy Plc v SysGen Solutions Group Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 7, 2023
    ...v Smith at 137–38; Lac Minerals at 595; Roorda v MacIntyre, 2010 ABCA 156 at para 16; Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149 at para 140; Ruel v Rebonne, 2022 ABQB 271 at para 81. The terms of a contract can create the fiduciary relationship: Indutech at paras 29 ......
  • Bacanora Minerals Ltd v Orr-Ewing (Estate),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 23, 2021
    ...This Court had recent cause to summarize the law on discoverability in Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149 at paras The claimant must know sufficient facts on which an action could be brought, or those facts must be discoverable: Riddell Kurczaba Architecture Engineering ......
  • Prairiesky Royalty Ltd v Yangarra Resources Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 6, 2023
    ...that clearly connote an intention to create an interest in land (IFP Technologies at para 89; Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149 at para 109). To rebut the presumption of an interest in land arising from the plain wording of a royalty agreement, the remaining indicia and......
  • Signalta Resources Limited v Canadian Natural Resources Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 24, 2023
    ...was producing non-solution gas. [719]       CNRL also relies on Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149, particularly Wooley J’s comments about the “public availability” of the law at para 278. However, Hudson King is also di......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT