Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Douglas |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 517 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S1710845 |
| Date | 02 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Summary of Defamation Law
..., [1995] 2 SCR 1130 THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM Some examples of cases involving the plaintif’s claim and cyberlibel include: Hudson v Myong, 2020 BCSC 517 Chase v Aninson, 2018 BCSC 856 Nazerali v Mitchell, 2016 BCSC 810 Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 SCR 640 DEFENCES The defence of just......
-
Table of Cases
...219 Hourani v Thomson & Ors (Rev 1), [2017] EWHC 432 (QB) ...................................................34 Hudson v Myong, 2020 BCSC 517 ............................................................................................. 8 Hudspeth v Whatcott, 2017 ONSC 1708 .......................
-
Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd.,
...not published in print but the internet can be a particularly dangerous mode of publication for defamatory content. In Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517, Justice Douglas commented the speed and pervasiveness with which the internet can spread false and defamatory statements. See also Barrick G......
-
Seymour v. Nole,
...is defamatory (the “false” or “popular” innuendo meaning). [227] In Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517 at para. 109, Justice Douglas noted that not all unkind or potentially offensive statements about a person will be [109] G......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd.,
...not published in print but the internet can be a particularly dangerous mode of publication for defamatory content. In Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517, Justice Douglas commented the speed and pervasiveness with which the internet can spread false and defamatory statements. See also Barrick G......
-
Seymour v. Nole,
...is defamatory (the “false” or “popular” innuendo meaning). [227] In Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517 at para. 109, Justice Douglas noted that not all unkind or potentially offensive statements about a person will be [109] G......
-
Port Alberni Shelter Society v. Literacy Alberni Society,
...sense must be attributed to viewers. [40] In interpreting this threshold in Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517, Madam Justice Douglas held the threshold is higher than "mere words of abuse which injure a person's feelings, insult his or her pr......
-
Canada Easy Investment Store Corporation v. MacAskill,
...must establish on a balance of probabilities that the defendant was the author of the allegedly defamatory statements: Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517 at paras. 128–130 [Hudson]. The plaintiff must also prove the three elements of defamation, namely: (a) that the impugned stateme......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Summary of Defamation Law
..., [1995] 2 SCR 1130 THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM Some examples of cases involving the plaintif’s claim and cyberlibel include: Hudson v Myong, 2020 BCSC 517 Chase v Aninson, 2018 BCSC 856 Nazerali v Mitchell, 2016 BCSC 810 Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 SCR 640 DEFENCES The defence of just......
-
Table of Cases
...219 Hourani v Thomson & Ors (Rev 1), [2017] EWHC 432 (QB) ...................................................34 Hudson v Myong, 2020 BCSC 517 ............................................................................................. 8 Hudspeth v Whatcott, 2017 ONSC 1708 .......................