Hughes v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePerell
Citation2018 ONSC 4862
Docket NumberCV-14-518059CP
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date14 August 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 practice notes
  • When Hackers Strike: The Liability of Reckless Record Holders for Intrusion Upon Seclusion
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...c C.43 at s 131. Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 at r 57.01(1). CPA, above note 4. Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862. Ibid at para 75 citing Pearson v Inco Ltd, 2006 CanLII 7666 (ONCA). Ibid at para L a R ev ue C a nadienne des r ecour s collectifs | Volum......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...c C.43 at s 131. Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 at r 57.01(1). CPA, above note 4. Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862. Ibid at para 75 citing Pearson v Inco Ltd, 2006 CanLII 7666 (ONCA). Ibid at para L a R ev ue C a nadienne des r ecour s collectifs | Volum......
  • The Death of Champerty: Is Third Party Litigation Funding the New Normal in Class Actions?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...c C.43 at s 131. Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 at r 57.01(1). CPA, above note 4. Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862. Ibid at para 75 citing Pearson v Inco Ltd, 2006 CanLII 7666 (ONCA). Ibid at para L a R ev ue C a nadienne des r ecour s collectifs | Volum......
  • Entering a Legal Void: Independent Contractors and Class Actions Post-heller
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...c C.43 at s 131. Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 at r 57.01(1). CPA, above note 4. Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862. Ibid at para 75 citing Pearson v Inco Ltd, 2006 CanLII 7666 (ONCA). Ibid at para L a R ev ue C a nadienne des r ecour s collectifs | Volum......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Reddock v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 24, 2019
    ...name="_ftn13" title="" id="_ftn13">[13] (2006), 79 O.R. (3d) 427 at para. 13 (C.A.). [14] 2018 ONSC 4862, leave to appeal costs ref’d 2019 ONCA [15] 2014 ONSC 776. [16] costs awards in closely comparable cases. In this regard, Mr. Reddock relies on the following comparables: Hughes v. Liq......
  • Voutour v. MVG Investments,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 22, 2022
    ...jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court. The Defendants relied on the finding by Perell J. in Hughes v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862, at paras. 70-71, that the court has discretion to reduce the amount of costs to be awarded, or to order no award of costs, where “th......
  • Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 54
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 20, 2020
    ...awarded in class action, particularly at the certification stage of a proposed class action”: Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862 at para · No great weight should be placed on the “chilling effect that large costs awards may have on access to justice” in class actions, ......
  • Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 18, 2020
    ...1 [11] Reply Cost Submissions of the Defendant, the Attorney General of Canada at para. 7 [12] Hughes v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862 (CanLII) at para. 72 itself ·         after the word “litigant in the third line: Incr......
  • Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
  • L’accès à La Justice Pour Les Personnes Vulnérables Par La Voie de L’action Collective en Droit Québécois
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...c C.43 at s 131. Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 at r 57.01(1). CPA, above note 4. Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862. Ibid at para 75 citing Pearson v Inco Ltd, 2006 CanLII 7666 (ONCA). Ibid at para L a R ev ue C a nadienne des r ecour s collectifs | Volum......
  • When Hackers Strike: The Liability of Reckless Record Holders for Intrusion Upon Seclusion
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...c C.43 at s 131. Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 at r 57.01(1). CPA, above note 4. Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862. Ibid at para 75 citing Pearson v Inco Ltd, 2006 CanLII 7666 (ONCA). Ibid at para L a R ev ue C a nadienne des r ecour s collectifs | Volum......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...c C.43 at s 131. Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 at r 57.01(1). CPA, above note 4. Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862. Ibid at para 75 citing Pearson v Inco Ltd, 2006 CanLII 7666 (ONCA). Ibid at para L a R ev ue C a nadienne des r ecour s collectifs | Volum......
  • The Death of Champerty: Is Third Party Litigation Funding the New Normal in Class Actions?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...c C.43 at s 131. Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 at r 57.01(1). CPA, above note 4. Hughes v Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 4862. Ibid at para 75 citing Pearson v Inco Ltd, 2006 CanLII 7666 (ONCA). Ibid at para L a R ev ue C a nadienne des r ecour s collectifs | Volum......
  • Get Started for Free