Humboldt Electric Ltd. v. Worker's Compensation Board, 2016 SKQB 234

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeScherman, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Subject MatterADMINISTRATIVE LAW,COURTS,STATUTES,PRACTICE
Citation2016 SKQB 234,2013, SS 2013
Date30 June 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Abouhamra v. Prairie North Regional Health Authority, 2016 SKQB 293
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 7, 2016
    ...Scherman dealt with the nature of a de novo appeal hearing in Humboldt Electric Ltd. v Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board) , 2016 SKQB 234. At paras. 35 to 38 he notes that such a hearing is to be "open-ended", and to be ruled upon "as if the decision was being made in the original i......
  • Fuller v. Regina (City), 2016 QBG 1072
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 12, 2016
    ...2011 SCC 61, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 654 (S.C.C.), at para. 34. ... See also Humboldt Electric Ltd v Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board) , 2016 SKQB 234 at paras 14-18, where Scherman J. explores various cases which confirm that the phrase "true questions of jurisdiction" should be narrowly ......
  • CHAPMAN v. SASKATCHEWAN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD AND BALZERS CANADA INCORPORATED, 2017 SKQB 134
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 9, 2017
    ...Workers’ Compensation Board, 2012 SKCA 10, 385 Sask R 210; Humboldt Electric Ltd. v Saskatchewan (Workers’ Compensation Board), 2016 SKQB 234 [Humboldt Electric]) [23] Reasonableness is a deferential standard, but what does it entail and how should it be applied? As explained at para 47 of ......
  • Saskatoon (City) v Amalgamated Transit Union, 2017 SKCA 96
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 6, 2017
    ...judge erred in thinking differently.[25] The City bases its position solely on Humboldt Electric Ltd. v Workers’ Compensation Board, 2016 SKQB 234 [Humboldt Electric]. In that case, a Chambers judge relied on Fraser Health Authority v Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2014 BCCA 499, 38......
4 cases
  • Abouhamra v. Prairie North Regional Health Authority, 2016 SKQB 293
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 7, 2016
    ...Scherman dealt with the nature of a de novo appeal hearing in Humboldt Electric Ltd. v Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board) , 2016 SKQB 234. At paras. 35 to 38 he notes that such a hearing is to be "open-ended", and to be ruled upon "as if the decision was being made in the original i......
  • Fuller v. Regina (City), 2016 QBG 1072
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 12, 2016
    ...2011 SCC 61, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 654 (S.C.C.), at para. 34. ... See also Humboldt Electric Ltd v Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board) , 2016 SKQB 234 at paras 14-18, where Scherman J. explores various cases which confirm that the phrase "true questions of jurisdiction" should be narrowly ......
  • CHAPMAN v. SASKATCHEWAN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD AND BALZERS CANADA INCORPORATED, 2017 SKQB 134
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 9, 2017
    ...Workers’ Compensation Board, 2012 SKCA 10, 385 Sask R 210; Humboldt Electric Ltd. v Saskatchewan (Workers’ Compensation Board), 2016 SKQB 234 [Humboldt Electric]) [23] Reasonableness is a deferential standard, but what does it entail and how should it be applied? As explained at para 47 of ......
  • Saskatoon (City) v Amalgamated Transit Union, 2017 SKCA 96
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 6, 2017
    ...judge erred in thinking differently.[25] The City bases its position solely on Humboldt Electric Ltd. v Workers’ Compensation Board, 2016 SKQB 234 [Humboldt Electric]. In that case, a Chambers judge relied on Fraser Health Authority v Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2014 BCCA 499, 38......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT