I.P.P. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 123 |
| Date | 03 April 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
M.N. v. Canada (Citizienship and Immigration)
...suffers from a radical defect: it involves 20/20 hindsight. Justice Russell wrote in I.P.P. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 123, at paragraph 153, that “[a]pplicants who are dissatisfied with a negative decision often blame those who represented them. Such accusations are ea......
-
Adeniran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...to admit this document denied him a full opportunity to present his case, violating the duty of fairness articulated in IPP v Canada, 2018 FC 123 and claims the Refugee Protection Division Rules, SOR/2012-256 [RPD’s Rules] permit the flexible admission of [31] The Respondent submits the RPD......
2 cases
-
M.N. v. Canada (Citizienship and Immigration)
...suffers from a radical defect: it involves 20/20 hindsight. Justice Russell wrote in I.P.P. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 123, at paragraph 153, that “[a]pplicants who are dissatisfied with a negative decision often blame those who represented them. Such accusations are ea......
-
Adeniran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...to admit this document denied him a full opportunity to present his case, violating the duty of fairness articulated in IPP v Canada, 2018 FC 123 and claims the Refugee Protection Division Rules, SOR/2012-256 [RPD’s Rules] permit the flexible admission of [31] The Respondent submits the RPD......
