Ibekwe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 728

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2022 FC 728
Date16 May 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Moosavi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1037
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 28, 2023
    ...(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2017 FC 1067 at paras 12-17; see also Ibekwe v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 728 at paras 31-32. It was therefore open to the officer to find that the Applicant lacked sufficient or available funds for the program and to ......
  • Roudehchianahmadi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 626
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...basis that the applicant has failed to demonstrate sufficient funds to cover the entire duration of the program: Ibekwe v Canada (MCI), 2022 FC 728 at para 29; Ocran v Canada (MCI), 2022 FC 175 at para 44 [Ocran]; Onyeka v Canada (MCI), 2017 FC 1067 at para 12; Kavugho-Mission v Canada (MCI......
  • Asghari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 606
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 26, 2023
    ...to meet the statutory requirements set out under sections 216(1)(b) and 220 of IRPR (Ibekwe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 728 at para 31 [Ibekwe]). Section 220 of IRPR imposes an obligation on the Applicant to establish sufficient and available resources, without working i......
  • Ohuaregbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 480
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 24, 2023
    ...9). [25] This conclusion is sufficient to dismiss this application (Adekoya at para 10; Ibekwe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 728 at para 32 [Ibekwe]). B. Was there a breach of procedural (1) Applicant’s Position [26] The Officer breached the Applicant’s right......
7 cases
  • Aghvamiamoli v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1613
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 1, 2023
    ...be able to rely on sufficient funds to defray the costs of their stay for a longer period (Ibekwe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2022 FC 728 at para 29; Sayyar at para 12). [30] Considering the study plan and its costs, and with the banking information submitted, the Officer was not......
  • Sani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 396
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 12, 2024
    ...as living expenses for duration of the program (see, for example, Onyeka at paras 11-12; Ibekwe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 728 [Ibekwe] at para 29-30; Aghvamiamoli v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1613 [Aghvamiamoli] at para 29, citing Ibekwe at para 29......
  • Rajabi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 371
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 12, 2024
    ...at para 14, and Penez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1001 at paras 36- 37; Ibekwe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 728 at para [24] As stated in Aghvamiamoli v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1613: [20] An officer is not normally obliged to noti......
  • Moosavi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1037
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 28, 2023
    ...(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2017 FC 1067 at paras 12-17; see also Ibekwe v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 728 at paras 31-32. It was therefore open to the officer to find that the Applicant lacked sufficient or available funds for the program and to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT