Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | December 07, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2016 FC 1352 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Iggillis Holdings Inc. c. Canada (Revenu national),
...la jurisprudence et si le privilège d’intérêt commun est un élément constitutif valide du secret T-126-152016 FC 1352The Minister of National Revenue (Applicant)v.Iggillis Holdings Inc. and Ian Gillis (Respondents)andAbacus Capital Corporations Mergers and Ac......
-
In Defence Of Transactional Common Interest Privilege
...for its misplaced confidence that the threat to transactional common interest privilege created by the lower court's Iggillis decision (2016 FC 1352) has been neutralized by the Federal Court of Appeal's reversal of that decision. He suggests that transactional common interest privilege "un......
-
Federal Court Refuses To Recognize Common Interest Privilege In The Transactional Context
...of this doctrine that has become known as "transactional common interest privilege." Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352 (Iggillis) is significant because, in the words of the Court itself, it stands as the "first Canadian decision that concludes that [common i......
-
Iggillis Holdings Inc. c. Canada (Revenu national),
...of the lawyer who wrote the opinion but who is involved in common transactions with the client of that lawyer. The Federal Court Judge (2016 FC 1352, [2017] 4 F.C.R. 80) found:(a) at paragraph 72 of his reasons, that “the memo is legal advice provided by the lawyers to theirUTeWMdYo+......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
Iggillis Holdings Inc. c. Canada (Revenu national),
...la jurisprudence et si le privilège d’intérêt commun est un élément constitutif valide du secret T-126-152016 FC 1352The Minister of National Revenue (Applicant)v.Iggillis Holdings Inc. and Ian Gillis (Respondents)andAbacus Capital Corporations Mergers and Ac......
-
Iggillis Holdings Inc. c. Canada (Revenu national),
...of the lawyer who wrote the opinion but who is involved in common transactions with the client of that lawyer. The Federal Court Judge (2016 FC 1352, [2017] 4 F.C.R. 80) found:(a) at paragraph 72 of his reasons, that “the memo is legal advice provided by the lawyers to theirUTeWMdYo+......
14 firm's commentaries
-
In Defence Of Transactional Common Interest Privilege
...for its misplaced confidence that the threat to transactional common interest privilege created by the lower court's Iggillis decision (2016 FC 1352) has been neutralized by the Federal Court of Appeal's reversal of that decision. He suggests that transactional common interest privilege "un......
-
Federal Court Refuses To Recognize Common Interest Privilege In The Transactional Context
...of this doctrine that has become known as "transactional common interest privilege." Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352 (Iggillis) is significant because, in the words of the Court itself, it stands as the "first Canadian decision that concludes that [common i......
-
Federal Court Of Appeal Confirms Common Interest Privilege Applies In Commercial Transactions
...Revenue will seek leave. Footnotes 1 See 2018 FCA 51. 2 See Minister of National Revenue v. IGGillis Holdings Inc. and Ian Gillis, 2016 FC 1352. 3 See N.Y.S.3d 838 (Ct. App., 4 See Para. 42. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist......
-
Federal Court On Common Interest Privilege: Information Shared In A Transaction No Longer Protected
...on a matter of common legal interest not related to actual or anticipated litigation." Iggillis Holdings Inc v Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352 at Accordingly, if a person, such as a regulatory body, that was not a party to the transaction requested disclosure of such communication a......
Request a trial to view additional results