In Re: Court File No. 19/578, 2020 ONSC 3870

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeLEMON
Citation2020 ONSC 3870
Date22 June 2020
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Docket Number19-0578
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...55–56, 57 Cluett v R, [1985] 2 SCR 216, 21 DLR (4th) 306, [1985] SCJ No 54 ............ 33–34 Court File No 19/578 (Re), 2020 ONSC 3870 .................................................... 251 Crampton v Walton, 2005 ABCA 81 ......................................................... 33, 34, ......
  • Arrest and Compelling Appearance
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...the discussion of whether a person who appears remotely is or is not “present” as required by s 650(1) in In Re: Court File No. 19/578 , 2020 ONSC 3870. These decisions all predate the 2023 changes, but those changes are likely to have created as many new issues as they have cleared up. DET......
  • R. v. R.B., 2021 ONCJ 633
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • February 16, 2021
    ...“Mr.  Justice F. Javed”         [1] See R. v MacDonald, 2018 ONCA 369, 360 C.C.C. (3d) 494. [2] 2020 ONSC 3870 [3] See R. v. R. (R) (2001), 159 C.C.C. (3d) 11 (Ont. C.A.) at para. 43, affirmed on other grounds: 171 C.C.C. (3d) 575; R. v. A. (J.) 2011 S......
  • R v Twoyoungmen, 2021 ABPC 88
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 9, 2021
    ...paras 36-9, 51-60 [29] See for example, R v Ali, Boparai, et. al. 2020 BCSC 996 at paras 13-29, Re Court File No. 19/578, 2020 ONSC 3870, at paras 9-29, 32-6, R v Kerr, 2020 ONCJ 214, at paras [30] Justice Minister Anne McLellan, May 3rd, 2001, at https://www.o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • R. v. R.B.,
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • February 16, 2021
    ...“Mr.  Justice F. Javed”         [1] See R. v MacDonald, 2018 ONCA 369, 360 C.C.C. (3d) 494. [2] 2020 ONSC 3870 [3] See R. v. R. (R) (2001), 159 C.C.C. (3d) 11 (Ont. C.A.) at para. 43, affirmed on other grounds: 171 C.C.C. (3d) 575; R. v. A. (J.) 2011 S......
  • R v Twoyoungmen,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 9, 2021
    ...paras 36-9, 51-60 [29] See for example, R v Ali, Boparai, et. al. 2020 BCSC 996 at paras 13-29, Re Court File No. 19/578, 2020 ONSC 3870, at paras 9-29, 32-6, R v Kerr, 2020 ONCJ 214, at paras [30] Justice Minister Anne McLellan, May 3rd, 2001, at https://www.o......
  • R. v. Walsh,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 1, 2023
    ...would work to facilitate the presentation of the evidence. As in K.Z. and other cases (see for example, In Re: Court File No. 19/578, 2020 ONSC 3870; R. v. Gordon, 2021 SKQB 131 (CanLII) at para. 46(c)), I find a practice session with the witness and counsel will help ensure there is no tri......
  • R. v. PAHL,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 11, 2021
    ...principally on the following authorities for this conclusion: R v Daley, 2020 ONCJ 201, 163 WCB (2d) 411, and Re: Court File No. 19/578, 2020 ONSC 3870. [19]                At that time, the evidence presented by bot......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...55–56, 57 Cluett v R, [1985] 2 SCR 216, 21 DLR (4th) 306, [1985] SCJ No 54 ............ 33–34 Court File No 19/578 (Re), 2020 ONSC 3870 .................................................... 251 Crampton v Walton, 2005 ABCA 81 ......................................................... 33, 34, ......
  • Arrest and Compelling Appearance
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...the discussion of whether a person who appears remotely is or is not “present” as required by s 650(1) in In Re: Court File No. 19/578 , 2020 ONSC 3870. These decisions all predate the 2023 changes, but those changes are likely to have created as many new issues as they have cleared up. DET......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT