Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc.

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
JudgeRowles, Levine and Smith, JJ.A.
Citation(2003), 189 B.C.A.C. 251 (CA),2003 BCCA 610
Date14 November 2003
Subject MatterDAMAGES,PRACTICE,SALE OF LAND,CONTRACTS,BUILDING CONTRACTS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
71 practice notes
  • Peters v. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...2 S.C.R. 537; Harris v. Universal Explorations Ltd. (1982), 17 B.L.R. 135 (Alta. C.A.); Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc., 2003 BCCA 610. [29] Wong v. Pretium Resources Inc., 2017 ONSC 3361; Sharbern Holding Inc. v. Vancouver Airport Centre Ltd., 2011 SCC 23. [30] Miller v. FSD Ph......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 18, 2022 ' July 22, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 27, 2022
    ...RSBC 1996, c., 397, s 75, Sharbern Holding Inc. v Vancouver Airport Centre Ltd., 2011 SCC 23, Inmet Mining Corp. v Homestake Canada Inc., 2003 BCCA 610, Amirault v Westminer Canada Ltd. (1993), 120 NSR. (2d) 91, Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, Mask v Silvercorp Metals Inc., 2016 ONCA 641,......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Equitable Remedies. Second Edition
    • June 18, 2013
    ...2010 NLTD(G) 205 ................................................. 359 Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Ltd., 2002 BCSC 61, var’d 2003 BCCA 610 ...................................344, 371, 468–69 Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Patko, 2008 BCCA 65 ..............................
  • Mitigation, Avoided Loss, and Time of Assessment
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...a court may not refuse pre-judgment interest if it would be unjust to do so. For example, in Inmet Mining Corp v Homestake Canada Inc , 2003 BCCA 610 [ Inmet ], the court granted pre-judgment interest on damages that were assessed at the date of trial, because the specific performance claim......
  • Get Started for Free
53 cases
  • Peters v. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...2 S.C.R. 537; Harris v. Universal Explorations Ltd. (1982), 17 B.L.R. 135 (Alta. C.A.); Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc., 2003 BCCA 610. [29] Wong v. Pretium Resources Inc., 2017 ONSC 3361; Sharbern Holding Inc. v. Vancouver Airport Centre Ltd., 2011 SCC 23. [30] Miller v. FSD Ph......
  • Paniccia v. MDC Partners Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 4, 2018
    ...2 S.C.R. 537; Harris v. Universal Explorations Ltd. (1982), 17 B.L.R. 135 (Alta. C.A.); Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc., 2003 BCCA 610. [16] Sharbern Holding Inc. v. Vancouver Airport Centre Ltd., 2011 SCC 23; Wong v. Pretium Resources Inc., 2017 ONSC 3361 at paras. [17] Sharber......
  • Manitoba Eastern Star Chalet Inc. v. Dominion Construction Co.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 21, 2011
    ...essential". [33] This Court also considered the definition of materiality recently in Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc. , 2003 BCCA 610 (B.C. C.A.) ¶27. In the context of determining disclosure obligations of a seller under a contract for purchase and sale of a gold mine, Levine, ......
  • NIEBERGAL v. QHR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • December 9, 2020
    ...been incorporated into the law of British Columbia, almost a decade earlier. See, especially: Inmet Mining Corp. v Homestake Canada Inc., 2003 BCCA 610, 24 BCLR (4th) 1 [Inmet Mining Corp.]. See, also: Sparling v Royal Trustco Ltd. (1984), 6 DLR (4th) 682 (Ont CA), aff’d [1986] 2 SCR......
  • Get Started for Free
6 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 18, 2022 ' July 22, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 27, 2022
    ...RSBC 1996, c., 397, s 75, Sharbern Holding Inc. v Vancouver Airport Centre Ltd., 2011 SCC 23, Inmet Mining Corp. v Homestake Canada Inc., 2003 BCCA 610, Amirault v Westminer Canada Ltd. (1993), 120 NSR. (2d) 91, Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, Mask v Silvercorp Metals Inc., 2016 ONCA 641,......
  • The Consequences Of Failure To Disclose Material Information – Lions Gate Agrees To Pay SEC Significant Financial Penalty
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 26, 2014
    ...[1986] 2 SCR 537 (SCC); Harris v. Universal Explorations Ltd, (1982), 17 BLR 135 (Alta CA); Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc, 2003 BCCA 610; Agbi v Geosimm Integrated Technologies Corp., [1998] 7 WWR 398 (Alta CA); TSC Industries, Inc. v Northway, Inc.,426 US 438 (1976); Basic Inc......
  • Does The MAC Have Your Back? The Use Of Material Adverse Change Clauses In Canadian Loan Agreements
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 16, 2017
    ...81 (OCJ) ["Dynacare"]; and Inmet Mining Corporation v. Homestake Canada Inc., 2002 BCSC 61, 2002 CarswellBC 53, revers'd on other grounds 2003 BCCA 610, 2003 CarswellBC 2792 [8] Consumers Glass, ibid. at para 60. [9] See Consumers Glass, Cariboo and Inmet, supra. note 6. [10] See Dynacare, ......
  • Tariffs, M&A And Material Adverse Effect (MAE) Clauses
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 7, 2025
    ...Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc., 2002 BCSC 61 (CanLII) at para. 128. See also Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc., 2003 BCCA 610 (CanLII) where the appellate court, in affirming the lower court's ruling, also stressed the relevance of the buyer's 9. By contrast, the ABA'......
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • Specific Performance: Sale of Land
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...v Homestake Canada Ltd , 2002 BCSC 61, particularly at paras 402–5, order var’d on appeal but not on the issue of speciic performance 2003 BCCA 610. 157 Landmark of Thornhill , above note 25. 158 Condominium Act , RSO 1990, c C.26. THE LAW OF EQUITABLE REMEDIES 522 arrange their own inancin......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...301099 Ltd (Previn Court Homes), 2020 ONCA 103......................... 461 Inmet Mining Corp v Homestake Canada Ltd, 2002 BCSC 61, var’d 2003 BCCA 610...........................................................................480, 481, 521, 637–38 Innes v Kotylak, 2018 SKQB 325 ..................
  • Mitigation, Avoided Loss, and Time of Assessment
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...a court may not refuse pre-judgment interest if it would be unjust to do so. For example, in Inmet Mining Corp v Homestake Canada Inc , 2003 BCCA 610 [ Inmet ], the court granted pre-judgment interest on damages that were assessed at the date of trial, because the specific performance claim......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...301 Inflexible HMS, The (1857), Sw 200, 5 WR 517, 28 LTOS 374 ...................... 89, 93 Inmet Mining Corp v Homestake Canada Inc, 2003 BCCA 610 ....................... 464 Insurance Corp of British Columbia v Awla, 2012 BCSC 998 ............................. 82 Insurance Corp of British......
  • Get Started for Free