Iqbal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 170
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 170 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 30 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Fabunmi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1009
...the decision on fairness grounds when no new issue was raised”: Ibrahim, above at para 30; Iqbal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 170 at para 55. In the case before me, the Applicant has challenged the RAD’s findings without explaining why the RPD has a meaningful advantage o......
-
Ashraf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 377
...applicants rely on Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Kaler, 2019 FC 883 at para 16, and Iqbal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 170 at para 38, to support their contention that it was unreasonable for the RAD to decline to address the IFA issue. In my view, unsurprisingly......
2 cases
-
Fabunmi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1009
...the decision on fairness grounds when no new issue was raised”: Ibrahim, above at para 30; Iqbal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 170 at para 55. In the case before me, the Applicant has challenged the RAD’s findings without explaining why the RPD has a meaningful advantage o......
-
Ashraf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 377
...applicants rely on Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Kaler, 2019 FC 883 at para 16, and Iqbal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 170 at para 38, to support their contention that it was unreasonable for the RAD to decline to address the IFA issue. In my view, unsurprisingly......