J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Chief Justice Bauman,The Honourable Madam Justice D. Smith,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch
Citation2018 BCCA 325
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Date20 August 2018
Docket NumberCA43000; CA43392
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Jin v. Cheng, 2019 BCSC 148
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 6, 2019
    ...it. It also serves to distance the court from the conduct at issue. See also J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325 at para. [46] In Friedlander v. Claman, 2015 BCSC 482 [Friedlander], Madam Justice Gropper affirmed that the test for a special costs award ......
  • McHattie v. Central Saanich (District),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...taken in bad faith, and impertinence”: Shen at para. 32, citing J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325 at para. 57. I am not satisfied there was misconduct of that nature in this case. CONCLUSION [29]       In summary, ......
  • 2023 BCSC 663,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...taken in bad faith, and impertinence”: Shen at para. 32, citing J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325 at para. 57. I am not satisfied there was misconduct of that nature in this CONCLUSION 29 In summary, I am not satisfied the circumstances of this......
  • McHattie v Central Saanich (District),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...taken in bad faith, and impertinence”: Shen at para. 32, citing J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325 at para. 57. I am not satisfied there was misconduct of that nature in this CONCLUSION 29 In summary, I am not satisfied the circumstances of this......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Jin v. Cheng, 2019 BCSC 148
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 6, 2019
    ...it. It also serves to distance the court from the conduct at issue. See also J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325 at para. [46] In Friedlander v. Claman, 2015 BCSC 482 [Friedlander], Madam Justice Gropper affirmed that the test for a special costs award ......
  • McHattie v. Central Saanich (District),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...taken in bad faith, and impertinence”: Shen at para. 32, citing J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325 at para. 57. I am not satisfied there was misconduct of that nature in this case. CONCLUSION [29]       In summary, ......
  • 2023 BCSC 663,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...taken in bad faith, and impertinence”: Shen at para. 32, citing J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325 at para. 57. I am not satisfied there was misconduct of that nature in this CONCLUSION 29 In summary, I am not satisfied the circumstances of this......
  • McHattie v Central Saanich (District),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...taken in bad faith, and impertinence”: Shen at para. 32, citing J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2018 BCCA 325 at para. 57. I am not satisfied there was misconduct of that nature in this CONCLUSION 29 In summary, I am not satisfied the circumstances of this......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT