Jacobucci v. Jacobucci, (2006) 208 Man.R.(2d) 119 (CA)
Judge | Huband, Monnin and Freedman, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Case Date | September 20, 2006 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | (2006), 208 Man.R.(2d) 119 (CA);2006 MBCA 109 |
Jacobucci v. Jacobucci (2006), 208 Man.R.(2d) 119 (CA);
383 W.A.C. 119
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] Man.R.(2d) TBEd. SE.016
Tammy Lynn Jacobucci (petitioner/respondent) v. Daniel Gerald Jacobucci (respondent/appellant)
(AF 05-30-06280; 2006 MBCA 109)
Indexed As: Jacobucci v. Jacobucci
Manitoba Court of Appeal
Huband, Monnin and Freedman, JJ.A.
September 20, 2006.
Summary:
A divorced father appealed an order dismissing his application to vary child support payments.
The Manitoba Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
Editor's Note: For a related case involving these parties see 133 Man.R.(2d) 306.
Family Law - Topic 4017
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance and awards - Awards - Variation of periodic payments or lump sum award - A divorced father applied to vary a June 2000 child support consent order which provided for payments in excess of the Child Support Guidelines - The motions judge dismissed the application after making strong credibility findings against the husband - The motions judge stated, inter alia, that an applicant seeking a reduction of his child support obligation had to meet a high evidentiary standard - The father's evidence of his income simply did not ring true and to the degree necessary to support a child support variation application - The Manitoba Court of Appeal dismissed the father's appeal - The effect of the judge's finding with respect to the father's credibility basically meant that there was no evidence before him to justify varying the existing order - He made no error in dismissing the application.
Counsel:
B.R. Kress, for the appellant;
S.B. Malamud, for the respondent;
M.C. Stephensen, for the Director of Employment and Income Assistance.
This appeal was heard on September 20, 2006, before Huband, Monnin and Freedman, JJ.A., of the Manitoba Court of Appeal. Monnin, J.A., pronounced the following decision for the court on that date.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Evidence; procedure; costs
...order, the court must give reasons for that decision. Section 12 of the Interjurisdictional Support Orders 8 Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109. 9 Mitro v Mitro (1978), 1 RFL (2d) 382 (Ont CA). 10 RSO 1990, c C12. 11 TDL v LRL (1994), 4 RFL (4th) 103 (Ont Ct Gen Div). 12 D(JS) v V(WL) (19......
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Schipper v Maher, [2002] MJ No 319 (QB). Welsh v Welsh, [1998] OJ No 4550 (Gen Div). Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109. Mitro v Mitro (1978), 1 RFL (2d) 382 (Ont 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 SCR 3 at para 49; see also GRR v JES, 2020 NBQB 154. RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28 ......
-
Table of Cases
...433 Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109, [2006] MJ No 322.................................................................................583 Jacques v Jacques, [1997] SJ No 265 (QB)..................................................................................................................
-
Table of cases
...414 Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109, [2006] MJ No 322 ................................................................................553 Table of Cases 651 Jacques v Jacques, [1997] SJ No 265 (QB) ..............................................................................................
-
Table of Cases
...433 Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109, [2006] MJ No 322.................................................................................583 Jacques v Jacques, [1997] SJ No 265 (QB)..................................................................................................................
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Schipper v Maher, [2002] MJ No 319 (QB). Welsh v Welsh, [1998] OJ No 4550 (Gen Div). Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109. Mitro v Mitro (1978), 1 RFL (2d) 382 (Ont 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 SCR 3 at para 49; see also GRR v JES, 2020 NBQB 154. RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28 ......
-
Evidence; procedure; costs
...order, the court must give reasons for that decision. Section 12 of the Interjurisdictional Support Orders 8 Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109. 9 Mitro v Mitro (1978), 1 RFL (2d) 382 (Ont CA). 10 RSO 1990, c C12. 11 TDL v LRL (1994), 4 RFL (4th) 103 (Ont Ct Gen Div). 12 D(JS) v V(WL) (19......
-
Table of cases
...414 Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109, [2006] MJ No 322 ................................................................................553 Table of Cases 651 Jacques v Jacques, [1997] SJ No 265 (QB) ..............................................................................................