Jahnke v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeRichards C.J.S.,Caldwell,Whitmore
Citation2018 SKCA 59
Date31 July 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACV3029
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Digest: Jahnke v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • July 18, 2019
    ...as: 2018 SKCA 59 Docket Number: CA17170 , CACV 3029 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-07-18 Judges: Richards Caldwell Whitmore Subjects: Corporations � Shareholder Remedies � Derivative Action � Leave to Commence � Appeal Statutes � Interpretation � Business Corporations Act, Section 232 Di......
  • 2538520 Ontario Ltd. v. Eastern Platinum Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 16, 2020
    ...to undertake the costs and inconvenience of pursuing it: Primex (S.C.) at para. 49; Lions Gate at paras. 163–165; Jahnke v. Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59 at para. [39] Even where the conditions in s. 233(1) are met, the court retains discretion as to whether to grant leave: Discovery Enterprises (C......
  • CPC Networks Corp. v McDougall Gauley LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 22, 2021
    ...to a particular aspect of that third condition, being whether the proposed derivative action has sufficient merit. In Jahnke v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59, 82 BLR (5th) 196 [Jahnke], this Court adopted the test specified by Baynton J. in Schafer v International Capital Corporation (1996), 153 Sas......
  • Budd v. Bertram, 2018 NSCA 95
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • November 29, 2018
    ...Result: Appeal dismissed. The Court adopts the position of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal set out in paragraph 68 of Jahnke v. Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59. The central consideration in any s.4 (2)(c) inquiry is the strength of the proposed action, but that it is not the only or, necessarily, th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • 2538520 Ontario Ltd. v. Eastern Platinum Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 16, 2020
    ...to undertake the costs and inconvenience of pursuing it: Primex (S.C.) at para. 49; Lions Gate at paras. 163–165; Jahnke v. Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59 at para. [39] Even where the conditions in s. 233(1) are met, the court retains discretion as to whether to grant leave: Discovery Enterprises (C......
  • CPC Networks Corp. v McDougall Gauley LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 22, 2021
    ...to a particular aspect of that third condition, being whether the proposed derivative action has sufficient merit. In Jahnke v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59, 82 BLR (5th) 196 [Jahnke], this Court adopted the test specified by Baynton J. in Schafer v International Capital Corporation (1996), 153 Sas......
  • Budd v. Bertram, 2018 NSCA 95
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • November 29, 2018
    ...Result: Appeal dismissed. The Court adopts the position of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal set out in paragraph 68 of Jahnke v. Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59. The central consideration in any s.4 (2)(c) inquiry is the strength of the proposed action, but that it is not the only or, necessarily, th......
  • GILMORE MASONRY HEATERS INC. v. REED, 2021 SKQB 29
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 2, 2021
    ...Masonry obtained a Certificate of Revival is of little moment. [25] I am fortified in my conclusion by the decision in Jahnke v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59 in which Richards C.J.S. for a unanimous court stated at para. [47] The dissolution of a corporation means, as per s. 206(5) of the BCA, that......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: Jahnke v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 59
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • July 18, 2019
    ...as: 2018 SKCA 59 Docket Number: CA17170 , CACV 3029 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-07-18 Judges: Richards Caldwell Whitmore Subjects: Corporations � Shareholder Remedies � Derivative Action � Leave to Commence � Appeal Statutes � Interpretation � Business Corporations Act, Section 232 Di......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT