Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2023 FC 912

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date28 June 2023
Citation2023 FC 912
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2023 FCA 253
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 22, 2023
    ...LOCKE J.A. I. Background [1] Janssen Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. (collectively, Janssen) appeal a decision of the Federal Court (2023 FC 912, per Justice Michael D. Manson), which dismissed Janssen’s motion for summary judgment in four related patent infringement actions (Nos......
  • Declaration Of Infringement Does Not Preclude Further NOA Based On Invalidity
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 31, 2023
    ...patent for dosing regimens of paliperidone palmitate (INVEGA SUSTENNA) (Canadian Patent No. 2,655,335 (335 patent)): Janssen v Apotex, 2023 FC 912. Janssen argued that Apotex's sole invalidity defence of unpatentable subject matter (method of medical treatment) was res judicata, an abuse of......
  • Federal Court Of Appeal Confirms No Litigation By Installments In Patent Cases'even Under The PM(NOC) Regulations
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 22, 2024
    ...the new NOAs and moved for summary judgment. It argued (among other things) that Apotex's subsequent NOAs were an abuse of process. In 2023 FC 912, the Federal Court rejected Janssen's argument that Apotex should have raised the invalidity claim alongside the non-infringement claim in the p......
1 cases
  • Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2023 FCA 253
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 22, 2023
    ...LOCKE J.A. I. Background [1] Janssen Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. (collectively, Janssen) appeal a decision of the Federal Court (2023 FC 912, per Justice Michael D. Manson), which dismissed Janssen’s motion for summary judgment in four related patent infringement actions (Nos......
2 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT