Janssen Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 62

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2022 FC 62
Date19 January 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 practice notes
  • Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2022 FC 996
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 6, 2022
    ...If it were otherwise, inducing infringement could never be found in the context of pharmaceutical patents: Janssen Inc v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 62 at paras 132-133, 137 [Pharmascience Paliperidone]; Janssen Inc v Apotex Inc, 2022 FC 107 at paras 142-143, 148 [Apotex Paliperidone]. Furth......
  • Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2023 FCA 253
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 22, 2023
    ...in the original proceeding. That proceeding (T-1441-20) resulted in a summary trial regarding PMS’s non-infringement allegation (2022 FC 62, 190 C.P.R. (4 th) 1, which is the subject of an appeal in this Court, File No. A-69-22, which has been heard and remains under reserve), and p......
  • 2022 Year In Review: IP Litigation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 7, 2023
    ...by alleged infringers, warranting the actions to proceed to trial on the remaining defences of invalidity (Janssen Inc v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 62; Janssen Inc v Apotex Inc, 2022 FC 107); and (3) that there was no infringement, and dismissed the action in its entirety, in a motion broug......
  • Janssen Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 1218
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 23, 2022
    ...dose) of any of the 63 claims of the 335 Patent and, therefore, cannot infringe the 335 Patent. [48] In Janssen Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 62 [PMS Paliperidone], I found that Janssen had shown, on a balance of probabilities, that Pharmascience’s proposed pms-PALIPERIDONE PAL......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2022 FC 996
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 6, 2022
    ...If it were otherwise, inducing infringement could never be found in the context of pharmaceutical patents: Janssen Inc v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 62 at paras 132-133, 137 [Pharmascience Paliperidone]; Janssen Inc v Apotex Inc, 2022 FC 107 at paras 142-143, 148 [Apotex Paliperidone]. Furth......
  • Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2023 FCA 253
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 22, 2023
    ...in the original proceeding. That proceeding (T-1441-20) resulted in a summary trial regarding PMS’s non-infringement allegation (2022 FC 62, 190 C.P.R. (4 th) 1, which is the subject of an appeal in this Court, File No. A-69-22, which has been heard and remains under reserve), and p......
  • Janssen Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 1218
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 23, 2022
    ...dose) of any of the 63 claims of the 335 Patent and, therefore, cannot infringe the 335 Patent. [48] In Janssen Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 62 [PMS Paliperidone], I found that Janssen had shown, on a balance of probabilities, that Pharmascience’s proposed pms-PALIPERIDONE PAL......
  • UPL NA Inc. v. AgraCity Crop & Nutrition Ltd., 2022 FC 1422
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 10, 2022
    ...is an analogy to be made as between a drug product monograph and the end-use label for an herbicide [see Janssen Inc v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 62 at paras 125, 129; Abbott Laboratories Limited v Canada (Ministry of National Health and Welfare), 2006 FC 1411 at para 40, aff’d 2007 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 firm's commentaries
  • 2022 Year In Review: IP Litigation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 7, 2023
    ...by alleged infringers, warranting the actions to proceed to trial on the remaining defences of invalidity (Janssen Inc v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 62; Janssen Inc v Apotex Inc, 2022 FC 107); and (3) that there was no infringement, and dismissed the action in its entirety, in a motion broug......
  • Canadian Patent Law 2022: A Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 16, 2023
    ...The Federal Court also found liability for inducing infringement based on a product monograph in Janssen Inc v Pharmascience, 2022 FC 62 and Janssen Inc v Apotex Inc, 2022 FC 107 (a further discussion of which can be found in our February 25, 2022 article), despite the fact that Apotex an......
  • A Coming Of Age For The Federal Court Summary Trial In Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 7, 2022
    ...a summary trial is appropriate, the burden and onus of the underlying actions applies. See, e.g. Janssen Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 62, paras 57-58; Mud Engineering Inc. v. Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc., 2022 FC 943, paras 4 Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106, s 216(6). 5 Fe......
  • Federal Court Holds Summary Trial Appropriate, Apotex And Pharmascience Will Induce Infringement Of Paliperidone Palmitate Patent
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 2, 2022
    ...a pair of decisions in patent litigation relating to paliperidone palmitate (Janssen's INVEGA SUSTENNA): Janssen Inc v Pharmascience, 2022 FC 62 and Janssen Inc v Apotex, 2022 FC 107. Pharmascience and Apotex each brought a motion for summary trial, seeking to dismiss Janssen's actions for ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT