Janssen Inc. et al. v. Teva Canada Ltd., 2012 FC 48
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
Citation | 2012 FC 48,[2012] F.T.R. Uned. 27,[2012] F.T.R. Uned. 27 (FC) |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Date | 12 January 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Janssen-Ortho Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., (2012) 428 N.R. 318 (FCA)
...et al., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 454 ; 2009 FC 822 , refd to. [para. 6]. Janssen Inc. et al. v. Teva Canada Ltd., [2012] F.T.R. Uned. 27 ; 2012 FC 48, appld. [para. Minde v. Ermineskin Cree Nation et al., [2009] N.R. Uned. 38 ; 2009 FCA 128 , refd to. [para. 13]. Morphy v. Canada (Attorney ......
-
Collins v. Canada (Attorney General), (2014) 454 F.T.R. 106 (FC)
...(Attorney General) (2008), 323 F.T.R. 146; 2008 FC 33, refd to. [para. 41]. Pimparé v. Canada (Attorney General) (2012), 411 F.T.R. 177; 2012 FC 48, refd to. [para. Pearce v. Parole Board of Canada (2012), 416 F.T.R. 21; 2012 FC 923, refd to. [para. 49]. Collier v. Canada (Attorney General)......
-
Fournier Pharma Inc. et al. v. Canada (Minister of Health) et al., [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 405
...to limit or decrease the travel costs recoverable by Sandoz. In support of this counsel refers to Janssen Inc v Tava Canada Ltd , 2012 FC 48 at paragraph 133, Bayer AG v Novopharm Ltd , 2009 FC 1230 at paragraph 41, Novopharm Ltd v Janssen-Ortho Inc , 2012 FCA 29 at paragraph 38 and See You......
-
Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Tetra Tech Eba Inc., 2023 FC 347
...to submit a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 397 of the FCR. The Plaintiff cited the decisions Janssen Inc v Teva Canada Ltd, 2012 FC 48, at paragraph 40 [Janssen]; Merck & Co v Canada (Minister of Health), 2007 FC 312, at paragraph 9; and Bayer AG v Novopharm Ltd, 2009 FC 12......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Janssen-Ortho Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., (2012) 428 N.R. 318 (FCA)
...et al., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 454 ; 2009 FC 822 , refd to. [para. 6]. Janssen Inc. et al. v. Teva Canada Ltd., [2012] F.T.R. Uned. 27 ; 2012 FC 48, appld. [para. Minde v. Ermineskin Cree Nation et al., [2009] N.R. Uned. 38 ; 2009 FCA 128 , refd to. [para. 13]. Morphy v. Canada (Attorney ......
-
Collins v. Canada (Attorney General), (2014) 454 F.T.R. 106 (FC)
...(Attorney General) (2008), 323 F.T.R. 146; 2008 FC 33, refd to. [para. 41]. Pimparé v. Canada (Attorney General) (2012), 411 F.T.R. 177; 2012 FC 48, refd to. [para. Pearce v. Parole Board of Canada (2012), 416 F.T.R. 21; 2012 FC 923, refd to. [para. 49]. Collier v. Canada (Attorney General)......
-
Fournier Pharma Inc. et al. v. Canada (Minister of Health) et al., [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 405
...to limit or decrease the travel costs recoverable by Sandoz. In support of this counsel refers to Janssen Inc v Tava Canada Ltd , 2012 FC 48 at paragraph 133, Bayer AG v Novopharm Ltd , 2009 FC 1230 at paragraph 41, Novopharm Ltd v Janssen-Ortho Inc , 2012 FCA 29 at paragraph 38 and See You......
-
Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Tetra Tech Eba Inc., 2023 FC 347
...to submit a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 397 of the FCR. The Plaintiff cited the decisions Janssen Inc v Teva Canada Ltd, 2012 FC 48, at paragraph 40 [Janssen]; Merck & Co v Canada (Minister of Health), 2007 FC 312, at paragraph 9; and Bayer AG v Novopharm Ltd, 2009 FC 12......
Request a trial to view additional results