Jassar v. Kim

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeMacaulay, J.
Citation[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 782 (SC),2009 BCSC 782,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 782
Date12 June 2009
Subject MatterCONTRACTS,RESTITUTION,PRACTICE,TRUSTS,AGENCY

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Pure v. BC-Alta
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 20, 2019
    ...that render it unjust for the opposing party to retain the benefit conferred by the provision of the services”: Jassar v. Kim, 2009 BCSC 782 at para. 23, citing Consulate Ventures Inc. v. Amico Contracting & Engineering (1992) Inc., 2007 ONCA 324 at para. 99; see also Nygard v. Continen......
  • Wong v. Transamerica Life Canada et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 31, 2015
    ...what his or her conduct reasonably bears. [20] If a party alleges a signature is a forgery, expert evidence is required: Jassar v. Kim , 2009 BCSC 782 at para. 16. · Conclusion [21] A matter must be decided on the basis of the evidence presented. While Ms. Pham has denied the existence of t......
  • D. Kendall & Son Contracting Ltd. v. Pineault Welding & Fabricating Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 7, 2019
    ...of the written agreement is a forgery (as is required according to Wong v. Jang, 2015 BCSC 1540, at paras. 20 and 51; and Jassar v. Kim, 2009 BCSC 782, at para. [32] In cross-examination, Mr. Pineault confirmed as being authentic several examples of his signature from other exhibits at tria......
3 cases
  • Pure v. BC-Alta
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 20, 2019
    ...that render it unjust for the opposing party to retain the benefit conferred by the provision of the services”: Jassar v. Kim, 2009 BCSC 782 at para. 23, citing Consulate Ventures Inc. v. Amico Contracting & Engineering (1992) Inc., 2007 ONCA 324 at para. 99; see also Nygard v. Continen......
  • Wong v. Transamerica Life Canada et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 31, 2015
    ...what his or her conduct reasonably bears. [20] If a party alleges a signature is a forgery, expert evidence is required: Jassar v. Kim , 2009 BCSC 782 at para. 16. · Conclusion [21] A matter must be decided on the basis of the evidence presented. While Ms. Pham has denied the existence of t......
  • D. Kendall & Son Contracting Ltd. v. Pineault Welding & Fabricating Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 7, 2019
    ...of the written agreement is a forgery (as is required according to Wong v. Jang, 2015 BCSC 1540, at paras. 20 and 51; and Jassar v. Kim, 2009 BCSC 782, at para. [32] In cross-examination, Mr. Pineault confirmed as being authentic several examples of his signature from other exhibits at tria......