Jauhal v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2019 BCSC 1914

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Crerar
Citation2019 BCSC 1914
Docket NumberS-198190
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date07 November 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Wood-Tod v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2020 BCSC 155
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 10, 2020
    ...v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) 2019 BCSC 316, Kirby; and Jauhal v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2019 BCSC 1914, which consider what evidence is required where the driving prohibition is based upon a refusal or failure to provide an adequate breath sample, ra......
  • Kuzmanovic v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2021 BCCA 83
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...of Motor Vehicles, 2019 BCSC 1913, Vancouver Docket S195318; and Jauhal v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2019 BCSC 1914, Vancouver Counsel for the Appellants (via videoconference): B.H. Moscoe Counsel for the Respondents (via videoconference): Z. Froese......
2 cases
  • Wood-Tod v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2020 BCSC 155
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 10, 2020
    ...v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) 2019 BCSC 316, Kirby; and Jauhal v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2019 BCSC 1914, which consider what evidence is required where the driving prohibition is based upon a refusal or failure to provide an adequate breath sample, ra......
  • Kuzmanovic v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2021 BCCA 83
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...of Motor Vehicles, 2019 BCSC 1913, Vancouver Docket S195318; and Jauhal v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2019 BCSC 1914, Vancouver Counsel for the Appellants (via videoconference): B.H. Moscoe Counsel for the Respondents (via videoconference): Z. Froese......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT