JC v KC
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Marion |
| Citation | 2022 ABKB 707 |
| Date | 24 October 2022 |
| Docket Number | FL01 36960 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Davis v Davis
...requiring a material change in circumstances: see LAS v WRS, 2019 ABCA 65 at para 13; Huitt v Huitt, 2021 ABCA 235 at para 8; JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707, Marion J at para 141. However, I do not consider the change to parenting made in the Award to be insubstantial. [27] It is true that parentin......
-
JC v KC, 2023 ABKB 96
...On October 24, 2022, I released my reasons dismissing the Appeal: JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707. My reasons provided that if the parties could not agree on costs of this Appeal within 30 days of this decision, they may make submissions to me in writing. The parties could not agree and the Appellan......
-
Simms v. van Patten
...and changing the current arrangement such that Ms. Simms is no longer the primary parent: see the cases cited at para 141 of JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707. [20] However, the change must also be considered in the context of the litigation, as a whole, including the Interim Order granted in February......
-
AA v TW
...depending on the circumstances of the child and the case. Marion J describes these three main categories of child counsel in JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707 at paras 51–65, highlighting their differences and VIII. Application of Child Counsel Principles to this Case 61 AA wants child counsel to be a......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Davis v Davis
...requiring a material change in circumstances: see LAS v WRS, 2019 ABCA 65 at para 13; Huitt v Huitt, 2021 ABCA 235 at para 8; JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707, Marion J at para 141. However, I do not consider the change to parenting made in the Award to be insubstantial. [27] It is true that parentin......
-
JC v KC, 2023 ABKB 96
...On October 24, 2022, I released my reasons dismissing the Appeal: JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707. My reasons provided that if the parties could not agree on costs of this Appeal within 30 days of this decision, they may make submissions to me in writing. The parties could not agree and the Appellan......
-
Simms v. van Patten
...and changing the current arrangement such that Ms. Simms is no longer the primary parent: see the cases cited at para 141 of JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707. [20] However, the change must also be considered in the context of the litigation, as a whole, including the Interim Order granted in February......
-
AA v TW
...depending on the circumstances of the child and the case. Marion J describes these three main categories of child counsel in JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707 at paras 51–65, highlighting their differences and VIII. Application of Child Counsel Principles to this Case 61 AA wants child counsel to be a......
Get Started for Free
