Jensen v. Chicoine, 2018 ONSC 95
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | R. A. Lococo, J. |
| Citation | 2018 ONSC 95 |
| Docket Number | CV-13-296 (Brantford) |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 05 January 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
When The Deal Goes South: Deposits, Unconscionability, And Relief From Forfeiture
...did not specifically refer to the $100,000, reflected an intention that the funds would stay with the seller. The trial judge in Jensen (2018 ONSC 95, paras. 42-50) declined to grant relief from forfeiture. In finding that it would not be unconscionable for the seller to retain the deposit,......
1 firm's commentaries
-
When The Deal Goes South: Deposits, Unconscionability, And Relief From Forfeiture
...did not specifically refer to the $100,000, reflected an intention that the funds would stay with the seller. The trial judge in Jensen (2018 ONSC 95, paras. 42-50) declined to grant relief from forfeiture. In finding that it would not be unconscionable for the seller to retain the deposit,......