Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2023 FCA 89 |
| Date | 28 April 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
17 practice notes
-
Price v Smith & Wesson Corporation,
...BCCA 28; Engen v. Hyundai Auto Canada Corp., 2021 ABQB 740, aff'd (on this point) 2023 ABCA 85; Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89; Canada (Attorney General) v. Nasogaluak, 2023 FCA 6; Nissan Canada Inc. v. Mueller, 2022 BCCA 338; Ewert v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 BC......
-
The commonality test in class action certification: the battleground of screening merits and fair process
...at paras 12 and 45. 20 See, for example, Kane v FCA US LLC, 2022 SKQB 69 at para 148; Macinnis v Bayer Inc, 2020 SKQB 307 at para 143. 21 2023 FCA 89 [Samsung]. 22 Ibid at para 3. 23 Ibid at para 91. L a R ev ue Ca nadienne des R eCouR s CoLLeCtifs | voLume 19 no 1 47 2) One-Part Test a) ......
-
Doan v. Canada,
...Gascon outlined in Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 [Jensen FC] (aff’d in Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2023 FCA 89), the certification conditions established in Rule 334.16(1) are akin to those applied by the courts in Ontario and British Columbia (Canada (At......
-
Bigeagle v. Canada,
...para. 21; Canada (Attorney General) v. Jost, 2020 FCA 212 at para. 21). [25] In a recent decision (Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89), this Court indicated that a “Motion Judge’s finding that the pleaded facts do not satisfy the requirements of the asserted c......
Get Started for Free
16 cases
-
Price v Smith & Wesson Corporation,
...BCCA 28; Engen v. Hyundai Auto Canada Corp., 2021 ABQB 740, aff'd (on this point) 2023 ABCA 85; Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89; Canada (Attorney General) v. Nasogaluak, 2023 FCA 6; Nissan Canada Inc. v. Mueller, 2022 BCCA 338; Ewert v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 BC......
-
Doan v. Canada,
...Gascon outlined in Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 [Jensen FC] (aff’d in Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2023 FCA 89), the certification conditions established in Rule 334.16(1) are akin to those applied by the courts in Ontario and British Columbia (Canada (At......
-
Bigeagle v. Canada,
...para. 21; Canada (Attorney General) v. Jost, 2020 FCA 212 at para. 21). [25] In a recent decision (Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89), this Court indicated that a “Motion Judge’s finding that the pleaded facts do not satisfy the requirements of the asserted c......
-
Pass Herald Ltd v. Google Llc, 2024 FC 1623
...bare allegations, bald conclusory statements or speculation that is unsupported by material facts.” Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2023 FCA 89 at para 15 [Jensen FCA] at para 52(b), endorsing Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 [Jensen FC] at paras 81–82. See also L’Orat......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
More Than 'Symbolic Scrutiny' Federal Court Of Appeal Clarifies Evidentiary Burden And Denies Certification
...notion that courts are confined solely to the pleadings in determining whether they disclose a reasonable cause of action. Footnotes 1. 2023 FCA 89, aff'g 2021 FC 1185 (Jensen 2. Hazan c. Micron Technology Inc., 2023 QCCA 132 at para 10. 3. Jensen (FC) at para 69. 4. Jensen (FC) at para 147......
-
Jensen V. Samsung: Federal Court Of Appeal Confirms Evidentiary Requirement More Than "Mere Formality"
...v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89, the Federal Court of Appeal (the "Court") upheld the lower court's refusal to certify a proposed class action involving allegations that the defendants had breached sections 45 and 46 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34 (the "Act"). The......
1 books & journal articles
-
The commonality test in class action certification: the battleground of screening merits and fair process
...at paras 12 and 45. 20 See, for example, Kane v FCA US LLC, 2022 SKQB 69 at para 148; Macinnis v Bayer Inc, 2020 SKQB 307 at para 143. 21 2023 FCA 89 [Samsung]. 22 Ibid at para 3. 23 Ibid at para 91. L a R ev ue Ca nadienne des R eCouR s CoLLeCtifs | voLume 19 no 1 47 2) One-Part Test a) ......