Jesuthasan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Citation | 2018 FC 142 |
Date | 07 February 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Garcia Diaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 321
...provides clear and well-founded explanations for doing so: Sutherland, at para 24; Jesuthasan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142 (Crampton CJ), at paras 43, 44 and 48. [98] Factual findings made by an officer are entitled to deference. Absent exceptional circumstances, a r......
-
Bakal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 417
...to other applicants who apply for permanent residence from within Canada or abroad: Jesuthasan, v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142, at paras 49 and 57; Kanguatjivi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 327, at para 67. 21 I recognize that in Apura v Canada (Citize......
-
Huang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 265
...to other applicants who apply for permanent residence from within Canada or abroad: Jesuthasan, v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142, at paras 49 and 57; Kanguatjivi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 327, at para 67. [21] I recognize that in Apura v Canada (Citi......
-
Shala v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 326
...Court has held that the officer is required to provide an explanation for doing so: Jesuthasan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142 (Crampton CJ) at para 48; Sutherland v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1212 (Gascon J.) at para 24. The officer’s reasons d......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
-
Garcia Diaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 321
...provides clear and well-founded explanations for doing so: Sutherland, at para 24; Jesuthasan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142 (Crampton CJ), at paras 43, 44 and 48. [98] Factual findings made by an officer are entitled to deference. Absent exceptional circumstances, a r......
-
Bakal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 417
...to other applicants who apply for permanent residence from within Canada or abroad: Jesuthasan, v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142, at paras 49 and 57; Kanguatjivi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 327, at para 67. 21 I recognize that in Apura v Canada (Citize......
-
Huang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 265
...to other applicants who apply for permanent residence from within Canada or abroad: Jesuthasan, v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142, at paras 49 and 57; Kanguatjivi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 327, at para 67. [21] I recognize that in Apura v Canada (Citi......
-
Shala v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 326
...Court has held that the officer is required to provide an explanation for doing so: Jesuthasan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142 (Crampton CJ) at para 48; Sutherland v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1212 (Gascon J.) at para 24. The officer’s reasons d......
Request a trial to view additional results