Jeyaredsagathas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) [h, 2018 FC 1238
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1238 |
| Date | 11 December 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Pathmanathan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 32
...decision unreasonable. [26] The Applicant submits that this matter is similar to Jeyaredsagathas v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1238 and that the Officer ought to have engaged with the Amnesty International letter. In Jeyaredsagathas, this Court found that the Amnesty Inter......
-
Seeniyan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 746
...Vilvarajah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 349 at paras 15-16, and Jeyaredsagathas v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1238 at para 32. It is unreasonable for the officer to have proceeded on the basis that the applicant might not answer questions about his activ......
2 cases
-
Pathmanathan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 32
...decision unreasonable. [26] The Applicant submits that this matter is similar to Jeyaredsagathas v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1238 and that the Officer ought to have engaged with the Amnesty International letter. In Jeyaredsagathas, this Court found that the Amnesty Inter......
-
Seeniyan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 746
...Vilvarajah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 349 at paras 15-16, and Jeyaredsagathas v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1238 at para 32. It is unreasonable for the officer to have proceeded on the basis that the applicant might not answer questions about his activ......