Jones v. Gerosa et al., 2016 ABQB 207

JudgeGraesser, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGES,TORTS,EMPLOYMENT LAW,CONTRACTS
Date08 April 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • MHK Insurance Inc v Wass,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 9 d4 Setembro d4 2021
    ...with the price of purchasing it in the industry: Rhebergen v Creston Veterinary Clinic Ltd, 2014 BCCA 97 at paras 26-42; Jones v Gerosa, 2016 ABQB 207 at paras 178-185 (in Alberta) and, generally, J G Collins Ins Agencies v Elsley Estate, [1978] 2 SCR 916 at para 22. [8]   &#......
  • Old Wine Into New Bottles: A Brief History And Current State Of The Law On Penalty Clauses
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 22 d1 Fevereiro d1 2021
    ...Birch et al v Union of Taxation Employees, Local 70030, 2008 ONCA 809, leave to appeal to the SCC refused. 3. Jones v Gerosa, 2016 ABQB 207 at para 118 ("Jones"), citing: Gunning v Thorne Riddell, 1990 CarswellBC 1541 (BCCA) at para 22 ("Gunning"); BLT Holdings Ltd v Excelsior Life Insuranc......
  • Employer-Friendly Restrictive Covenant Decisions Bloom In Ontario And Alberta | The HR Space
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 2 d3 Agosto d3 2017
    ...employer's favour, but only with respect to the use of confidential information, not the non-solicitation piece. Alberta: Jones v Gerosa 2016 ABQB 207 In Jones, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench also dealt with the enforceability of restrictive covenants. The action concerned a Fort McMurr......
1 cases
  • MHK Insurance Inc v Wass,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 9 d4 Setembro d4 2021
    ...with the price of purchasing it in the industry: Rhebergen v Creston Veterinary Clinic Ltd, 2014 BCCA 97 at paras 26-42; Jones v Gerosa, 2016 ABQB 207 at paras 178-185 (in Alberta) and, generally, J G Collins Ins Agencies v Elsley Estate, [1978] 2 SCR 916 at para 22. [8]   &#......
2 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT