Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 912 |
| Date | 18 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
...of evidence, or a veiled credibility concern. [28] As Justice Diner explained in Jystina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912, a finding of insufficient evidence and one of veiled credibility may be difficult to distinguish from one another; nevertheless, the two remain disti......
-
Iwekaeze v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 814
...with some cases adopting a reasonableness standard and others applying correctness: Jystina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 at para 19, citing Garces Canaga at para 22, Hare at para 11, Allushi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 722 at para 17, and FGH v Can......
-
Susal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1104
...Minister that, among other factors, the evidence raises a serious issue of credibility: Jystina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 [Jystina] at para 28. [27] The Officer’s role is to weigh the evidence submitted to determine if the Applicants have met the onus to provide su......
-
Gandhi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1132
...one is required and the evidence raises a serious issue of the applicant’s credibility: Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 (Diner J), at para 28. [36] The applicant made two arguments to support his position that a hearing was required. First, he submitted that in ......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
...of evidence, or a veiled credibility concern. [28] As Justice Diner explained in Jystina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912, a finding of insufficient evidence and one of veiled credibility may be difficult to distinguish from one another; nevertheless, the two remain disti......
-
Iwekaeze v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 814
...with some cases adopting a reasonableness standard and others applying correctness: Jystina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 at para 19, citing Garces Canaga at para 22, Hare at para 11, Allushi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 722 at para 17, and FGH v Can......
-
Susal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1104
...Minister that, among other factors, the evidence raises a serious issue of credibility: Jystina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 [Jystina] at para 28. [27] The Officer’s role is to weigh the evidence submitted to determine if the Applicants have met the onus to provide su......
-
Gandhi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1132
...one is required and the evidence raises a serious issue of the applicant’s credibility: Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 (Diner J), at para 28. [36] The applicant made two arguments to support his position that a hearing was required. First, he submitted that in ......
Request a trial to view additional results