K.G.K. v L.T.K.,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Jackson, Ottenbreit and Caldwell JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKCA 12 |
| Citation | 2021 SKCA 12 |
| Date | 22 January 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3724 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...Law Act, SS 2020, c 2). 206 Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; JP v JP, 2016 SKCA 168; Thievin v Thievin, 2019 SKCA 128; KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA 12; Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; Watts v Laframboise, 2021 SKQB 207 2012 NBCA 38 at para 14; see also Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; KGK v LTK, 2021 SK......
-
Friesen v Friesen,
...to examine whether permission should be granted for the child to move. He further referenced the dissenting opinion from K.G.K. v L.T.K., 2021 SKCA 12, as support for undertaking this sequential method of 13 The trial judge addressed whether the Agreement should be used to govern, or even a......
-
Stromberg v Olafson,
...paras 51-53. A Chambers judge has the authority to make an interim order on the basis of controverted affidavit evidence alone: K.G.K. [ 2021 SKCA 12] at para 24 and Koback v Koback, 2013 SKCA 91 at paras 14–15, [2013] 10 WWR 491. Of necessity, these types of orders are regularly mad......
-
SHOMAN v. MAIS,
...v. Shiplack, 2008 SKQB 254, 317 Sask. R. 223 at para. 19. (Also: Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; A.M.D. v M.R.M.; K.G.K. v L.T.K., 2021 SKCA 12; and Thievin v Thievin, 2019 SKCA 128, 30 RFL (8th) [57] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Friesen v Friesen,
...to examine whether permission should be granted for the child to move. He further referenced the dissenting opinion from K.G.K. v L.T.K., 2021 SKCA 12, as support for undertaking this sequential method of 13 The trial judge addressed whether the Agreement should be used to govern, or even a......
-
Stromberg v Olafson,
...paras 51-53. A Chambers judge has the authority to make an interim order on the basis of controverted affidavit evidence alone: K.G.K. [ 2021 SKCA 12] at para 24 and Koback v Koback, 2013 SKCA 91 at paras 14–15, [2013] 10 WWR 491. Of necessity, these types of orders are regularly mad......
-
SHOMAN v. MAIS,
...v. Shiplack, 2008 SKQB 254, 317 Sask. R. 223 at para. 19. (Also: Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; A.M.D. v M.R.M.; K.G.K. v L.T.K., 2021 SKCA 12; and Thievin v Thievin, 2019 SKCA 128, 30 RFL (8th) [57] ......
-
Mryglod v Tarling,
...97 at paras 6–7, 423 Sask R 151; L.P. v Z.M., 2021 SKCA 134 at para 31; Seidel v Seidel, 2021 SKCA 92 at para 1; K.G.K. v L.T.K., 2021 SKCA 12 at para 4; A.M.D. v M.R.M., 2021 SKCA 71 at paras 30–32; T.C. v A.E., 2021 SKCA 79 at paras 25–27; and Kot v Kot, 2021 SKCA 4 a......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...Law Act, SS 2020, c 2). 206 Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; JP v JP, 2016 SKCA 168; Thievin v Thievin, 2019 SKCA 128; KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA 12; Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; Watts v Laframboise, 2021 SKQB 207 2012 NBCA 38 at para 14; see also Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; KGK v LTK, 2021 SK......