K.G.K. v L.T.K.

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
JudgeJackson, Ottenbreit and Caldwell JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2021 SKCA 12
Citation2021 SKCA 12
Docket NumberCACV3724
Date22 January 2021

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...1444. 237 DA v CC, 2024 MBKB 37; Springstead v Springstead, 2022 ONSC 1906 at para 26; NM v BM, 2022 SKQB 138 at para 10. 238 KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA 12; Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; JMP v CJN, 2022 SKQB 239 2012 NBCA 38 at para 14; see also Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...KF v JF, 2022 NLCA 33 146 KFM v KGT, 2019 BCCA 339 461 KG v HG, 2021 NSSC 43 463, 472, 478, 530 KG v KM, 2019 NBCA 45 159, 517 KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA 12 494 Khairzad v Erroussa, 2021 ONCA 667 463 Khairzad v McFarlane, 2015 ONSC 7148 350 Khalid v Jalil, 2022 ONSC 5611 (Div Ct) 49 Khan v Ahmad,......
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...Law Act, SS 2020, c 2). 206 Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; JP v JP, 2016 SKCA 168; Thievin v Thievin, 2019 SKCA 128; KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA 12; Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; Watts v Laframboise, 2021 SKQB 207 2012 NBCA 38 at para 14; see also Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; KGK v LTK, 2021 SK......
  • Stromberg v Olafson
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 2, 2023
    ...at paras 51–53. A Chambers judge has the authority to make an interim order on the basis of controverted affidavit evidence alone: K.G.K. [2021 SKCA 12] at para 24 and Koback v Koback, 2013 SKCA 91 at paras 14–15, [2013] 10 WWR 491. Of necessity, these types of orders are regularly made on ......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • Stromberg v Olafson
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 2, 2023
    ...at paras 51–53. A Chambers judge has the authority to make an interim order on the basis of controverted affidavit evidence alone: K.G.K. [2021 SKCA 12] at para 24 and Koback v Koback, 2013 SKCA 91 at paras 14–15, [2013] 10 WWR 491. Of necessity, these types of orders are regularly made on ......
  • Friesen v Friesen
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 19, 2023
    ...to examine whether permission should be granted for the child to move. He further referenced the dissenting opinion from K.G.K. v L.T.K., 2021 SKCA 12, as support for undertaking this sequential method of analysis. [13] The trial judge addressed whether the Agreement should be used to gover......
  • D.S. v. K.C.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 4, 2025
    ...orders: Mais v Shoman, 2024 SKCA 57 at para 3, 4 RFL (9th) 10, R.C.S. v R.D.L., 2022 SKCA 52 at paras 19–20, K.G.K. v L.T.K., 2021 SKCA 12 at para 4, Wyatt v Reindl, 2020 SKCA 36 at para 11, 36 RFL (8th) 253, Russell at para 12, Bolan v Bolan, 2013 SKCA 97 at para&n......
  • SHOMAN v. MAIS
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 11, 2022
    ...v. Shiplack, 2008 SKQB 254, 317 Sask. R. 223 at para. 19. (Also: Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; A.M.D. v M.R.M.; K.G.K. v L.T.K., 2021 SKCA 12; and Thievin v Thievin, 2019 SKCA 128, 30 RFL (8th) [57]              ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...1444. 237 DA v CC, 2024 MBKB 37; Springstead v Springstead, 2022 ONSC 1906 at para 26; NM v BM, 2022 SKQB 138 at para 10. 238 KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA 12; Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; JMP v CJN, 2022 SKQB 239 2012 NBCA 38 at para 14; see also Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...KF v JF, 2022 NLCA 33 146 KFM v KGT, 2019 BCCA 339 461 KG v HG, 2021 NSSC 43 463, 472, 478, 530 KG v KM, 2019 NBCA 45 159, 517 KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA 12 494 Khairzad v Erroussa, 2021 ONCA 667 463 Khairzad v McFarlane, 2015 ONSC 7148 350 Khalid v Jalil, 2022 ONSC 5611 (Div Ct) 49 Khan v Ahmad,......
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...Law Act, SS 2020, c 2). 206 Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; JP v JP, 2016 SKCA 168; Thievin v Thievin, 2019 SKCA 128; KGK v LTK, 2021 SKCA 12; Arcand v Atsu, 2021 SKCA 81; Watts v Laframboise, 2021 SKQB 207 2012 NBCA 38 at para 14; see also Mantyka v Dueck, 2012 SKCA 109; KGK v LTK, 2021 SK......