K.J.N., Re, 2016 ABPC 100
| Judge | Tousignant, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | GUARDIAN AND WARD |
| Citation | 2016 ABPC 100 |
| Date | 06 May 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
MC (Re),
...and if necessary, to remove the child or children to a place of safety. This standard is described by Tousignant PCJ in KJN (Re), 2016 ABPC 100 at para The test for the return of the Child to the Mother is whether his survival, security or development can be “adequately protect......
-
J.W., Re, 2016 ABPC 185
...adequately protect the survival, security or development of the Children. [15] As was recently set out in the decision K.J.N. (Re) , 2016 ABPC 100 at para. 35, the test to determine whether the survival, security or development of the children can be adequately protected if they are returne......
-
JM (Re),
...not my intention to discuss each piece of evidence which was presented. There is no obligation on a Trial Judge to do so. See KJN (Re), 2016 ABPC 100 (KJN (Re)); AD v Alberta (Director of Child, Youth and Family Services), 2011 ABQB 577 at para 82; and Van de Perre v Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 at......
-
TL (Re),
...determined to have special needs. Absent special needs, the standard is ‘good enough parenting’. (see KJN (Re), 2016 ABPC 100 at paras 37, 38, and [705] A determination of whether a child is in need of intervention as specified i......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
MC (Re),
...and if necessary, to remove the child or children to a place of safety. This standard is described by Tousignant PCJ in KJN (Re), 2016 ABPC 100 at para The test for the return of the Child to the Mother is whether his survival, security or development can be “adequately protect......
-
J.W., Re, 2016 ABPC 185
...adequately protect the survival, security or development of the Children. [15] As was recently set out in the decision K.J.N. (Re) , 2016 ABPC 100 at para. 35, the test to determine whether the survival, security or development of the children can be adequately protected if they are returne......
-
JM (Re),
...not my intention to discuss each piece of evidence which was presented. There is no obligation on a Trial Judge to do so. See KJN (Re), 2016 ABPC 100 (KJN (Re)); AD v Alberta (Director of Child, Youth and Family Services), 2011 ABQB 577 at para 82; and Van de Perre v Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 at......
-
TL (Re),
...determined to have special needs. Absent special needs, the standard is ‘good enough parenting’. (see KJN (Re), 2016 ABPC 100 at paras 37, 38, and [705] A determination of whether a child is in need of intervention as specified i......
Request a trial to view additional results