K.R. v. J.R.

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeSchultes
Citation2022 BCSC 1856
Docket Number51523
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date24 October 2022

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • 2025 BCSC 2091,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2025
    ...under the Divorce Act [ DA], because it is ancillary to the divorce action: Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472 at para. 7; K.R. v. J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856 at para. 345; B.S.D. v. S.K.D., 2021 BCSC 2327 at para. 340; and L.A.M. v. F.B.M., 2022 BCSC 2187 at para. 223 Pursuant to s. 15.2(6) of the......
  • Li v Zhang,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 24, 2025
    ...under the Divorce Act [ DA], because it is ancillary to the divorce action: Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472 at para. 7; K.R. v. J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856 at para. 345; B.S.D. v. S.K.D., 2021 BCSC 2327 at para. 340; and L.A.M. v. F.B.M., 2022 BCSC 2187 at para. 223 Pursuant to s. 15.2(6) of the......
  • 2025 BCSC 975,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2025
    ...for spousal support as a request for corollary relief under the Divorce Act: Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472 at para. 7; K.R. v. J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856 at para. 345; L.A.M. v. F.B.M., 2022 BCSC 2187 at para. 9; and F.N. v. R.P., 2024 BCSC 118 at para. 209. However, in my view, the outcome w......
  • B.F.W. v F.P.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 27, 2025
    ...for spousal support as a request for corollary relief under the Divorce Act: Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472 at para. 7; K.R. v. J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856 at para. 345; L.A.M. v. F.B.M., 2022 BCSC 2187 at para. 9; and F.N. v. R.P., 2024 BCSC 118 at para. 209. However, in my view, the outcome w......
  • Get Started for Free
17 cases
  • 2025 BCSC 975,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2025
    ...for spousal support as a request for corollary relief under the Divorce Act: Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472 at para. 7; K.R. v. J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856 at para. 345; L.A.M. v. F.B.M., 2022 BCSC 2187 at para. 9; and F.N. v. R.P., 2024 BCSC 118 at para. 209. However, in my view, the outcome w......
  • B.F.W. v F.P.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 27, 2025
    ...for spousal support as a request for corollary relief under the Divorce Act: Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472 at para. 7; K.R. v. J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856 at para. 345; L.A.M. v. F.B.M., 2022 BCSC 2187 at para. 9; and F.N. v. R.P., 2024 BCSC 118 at para. 209. However, in my view, the outcome w......
  • 2024 BCSC 118,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...must be made under the DA, because it is ancillary to the divorce action: Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472 at para. 7; K.R. v. J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856 at para. 345; B.S.D. v. S.K.D., 2021 BCSC 2327 at para. 340; and L.A.M. v. F.B.M., 2022 BCSC 2187 at para. i. Compensatory 210 With respect to......
  • 2024 BCSC 1608,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...credibility. Similarly, intense animosity towards the opposing party may also adversely affect a witness's credibility: K.R. v. J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856 at paras. 19 The burden of proof in a civil dispute such as this is a balance of probabilities. Where there is conflicting testimony, “the tri......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Factors To Consider When Determining Income And Apportioning Section 7 Expenses
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 20, 2023
    ...children of the relationship, Section 7 expenses can be significant. In a recent Supreme Court of British Columbia decision, K.R. v J.R., 2022 BCSC 1856, the court ruled on how to determine the income of a parent who had multiple income sources, as well as how to apportion Section 7 expense......