Kadder v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 131
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Bell, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE |
| Citation | [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 131,[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 131 (FC),2016 FC 454 |
| Date | 21 April 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Sallai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 446
...is reviewed on the reasonableness standard because it is a question of mixed fact and law (Kadder v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 454 at para 11, 265 ACWS (3d) 1006). [24] As noted above, the Applicant argues that the failure to hold an oral hearing to permit him to address ......
-
Nadarasa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 95
...to come to a different conclusion. That is not the role of the Court on judicial review (Kadder v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 454 at para 15; Khosa at para 61). [21] For all of the above reasons, I find that the PRRA Officer’s decision is reasonable as it falls within a ra......
-
Zhou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 676
...“[i]t is not the role of the Court on judicial review to re-weigh the evidence”: Kadder v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 454 at para 15 [citing Ellero v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2008 FC 1364]. B. Reasonableness of RAD’s Credibility [18] I find the RA......
-
Woldemichael v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 655
...that “[i]t is not the role of the Court on judicial review to re-weigh the evidence”: Kadder v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 454 at para 15, citing Ellero v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2008 FC 1364. VII. A. Did the PRRA Officer err in the analysis of t......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Sallai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 446
...is reviewed on the reasonableness standard because it is a question of mixed fact and law (Kadder v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 454 at para 11, 265 ACWS (3d) 1006). [24] As noted above, the Applicant argues that the failure to hold an oral hearing to permit him to address ......
-
Nadarasa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 95
...to come to a different conclusion. That is not the role of the Court on judicial review (Kadder v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 454 at para 15; Khosa at para 61). [21] For all of the above reasons, I find that the PRRA Officer’s decision is reasonable as it falls within a ra......
-
Zhou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 676
...“[i]t is not the role of the Court on judicial review to re-weigh the evidence”: Kadder v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 454 at para 15 [citing Ellero v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2008 FC 1364]. B. Reasonableness of RAD’s Credibility [18] I find the RA......
-
Woldemichael v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 655
...that “[i]t is not the role of the Court on judicial review to re-weigh the evidence”: Kadder v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 454 at para 15, citing Ellero v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2008 FC 1364. VII. A. Did the PRRA Officer err in the analysis of t......
Request a trial to view additional results