Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 809 |
| Date | 04 August 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Asanova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1173
...(Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 184 at para 62; Toki at para 25; and my decision in Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809 at para 39. B. The Principles [33] In assessing whether the process afforded to the applicant was fair, the “ultimate question” is whether she ......
-
Du v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 10
...specific to give the Applicant a meaningful opportunity to address the Officer’s concerns (Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809 at para 39). While I recognize that the emphasis on certain words in the PFL could be confusing, I do not find that the sentence suggests that ......
-
Shah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1741
...visa officer followed satisfied the level of fairness required in all of the circumstances: Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809 at para 35. V. Analysis [21] The Applicant seeks to introduce new evidence, specifically the Affidavit of the Applicant, dated November 2, 202......
-
Mazzek v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 653
...to the interview, what about the “durable solution” issue remained of concern: Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809 at para 42. [24] Given the discussion on the issue that transpired during the interview, particularly that all new applications for Syrians a......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Asanova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1173
...(Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 184 at para 62; Toki at para 25; and my decision in Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809 at para 39. B. The Principles [33] In assessing whether the process afforded to the applicant was fair, the “ultimate question” is whether she ......
-
Du v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 10
...specific to give the Applicant a meaningful opportunity to address the Officer’s concerns (Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809 at para 39). While I recognize that the emphasis on certain words in the PFL could be confusing, I do not find that the sentence suggests that ......
-
Shah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1741
...visa officer followed satisfied the level of fairness required in all of the circumstances: Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809 at para 35. V. Analysis [21] The Applicant seeks to introduce new evidence, specifically the Affidavit of the Applicant, dated November 2, 202......
-
Mazzek v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 653
...to the interview, what about the “durable solution” issue remained of concern: Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 809 at para 42. [24] Given the discussion on the issue that transpired during the interview, particularly that all new applications for Syrians a......
Request a trial to view additional results