Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2022 FC 30 |
| Date | 11 January 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Raja v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 719
...at para 27, citing Arthur v Canada (Attorney General), 2001 FCA 223 at para 8; Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30 (“Kaur”) at para [42] The Applicant has not proffered any such evidence to meet the high threshold for a finding that the Officer’s dec......
-
Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 443
...Applicant (Sulce v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 1132 at para 10; see also Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30 at paras 11-16 [Kaur]). [33] In her affidavit, which was sworn four months after the interview, Ms. Kaur expressed the feeling that the Office......
-
Dhaliwal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1344
...of bias, which cannot rest on suspicion, conjecture, insinuation or impressions: Kaur v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30 paras 12-13. [20] In conclusion, the application for judicial review is allowed and the Officer’s decision is set aside. The matter sha......
3 cases
-
Raja v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 719
...at para 27, citing Arthur v Canada (Attorney General), 2001 FCA 223 at para 8; Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30 (“Kaur”) at para [42] The Applicant has not proffered any such evidence to meet the high threshold for a finding that the Officer’s dec......
-
Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 443
...Applicant (Sulce v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 1132 at para 10; see also Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30 at paras 11-16 [Kaur]). [33] In her affidavit, which was sworn four months after the interview, Ms. Kaur expressed the feeling that the Office......
-
Dhaliwal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1344
...of bias, which cannot rest on suspicion, conjecture, insinuation or impressions: Kaur v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30 paras 12-13. [20] In conclusion, the application for judicial review is allowed and the Officer’s decision is set aside. The matter sha......