Kawana v. Shemal, 2011 BCSC 377

JudgePearlman, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateMarch 31, 2011
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2011 BCSC 377;[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 377 (SC);[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 377
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Kawana v. Shemal, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1630 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 5, 2012
    ...of a family law trial, which concluded on March 31, 2011 when this Court delivered Reasons for Judgment indexed as Kawana v. Shemal , 2011 BCSC 377. [2] The claimant was substantially successful at trial. The respondent did not appeal the trial judgment. [3] Mr. Shemal, who had counsel at t......
  • Kawana v. Shemal, 2011 BCSC 1267
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 26, 2011
    ...Lee Kawana claims for the costs of the 11-day trial of this family law proceeding. By Reasons for Judgment indexed as Kawana v. Shemal , 2011 BCSC 377, the court determined the issues in dispute and invited written submissions on costs from the parties. While the plaintiff has delivered sub......
  • Kawana v. Shemal, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1573
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 29, 2013
    ...Court's Reasons for Judgment on the trial of the family law action were published on March 31, 2011 and are indexed as Kawana v. Shemal , 2011 BCSC 377. Regarding the Robson Drive property, this Court's order of March 31, 2011 provided that: 4. Pursuant to the consent order made by Mr. Just......
  • Blunt v. Lee, 2019 BCSC 351
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 14, 2019
    ...protects the integrity of the bargaining process: Rick at paras. 47. As summarized by Mr. Justice Pearlman in Kawana v. Shemal, 2011 BCSC 377 at para. 200, “[d]epending on the circumstances of each case, deliberate failure to make full disclosure may result in judicial intervention. The ext......
4 cases
  • Kawana v. Shemal, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1630 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 5, 2012
    ...of a family law trial, which concluded on March 31, 2011 when this Court delivered Reasons for Judgment indexed as Kawana v. Shemal , 2011 BCSC 377. [2] The claimant was substantially successful at trial. The respondent did not appeal the trial judgment. [3] Mr. Shemal, who had counsel at t......
  • Kawana v. Shemal, 2011 BCSC 1267
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 26, 2011
    ...Lee Kawana claims for the costs of the 11-day trial of this family law proceeding. By Reasons for Judgment indexed as Kawana v. Shemal , 2011 BCSC 377, the court determined the issues in dispute and invited written submissions on costs from the parties. While the plaintiff has delivered sub......
  • Kawana v. Shemal, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1573
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 29, 2013
    ...Court's Reasons for Judgment on the trial of the family law action were published on March 31, 2011 and are indexed as Kawana v. Shemal , 2011 BCSC 377. Regarding the Robson Drive property, this Court's order of March 31, 2011 provided that: 4. Pursuant to the consent order made by Mr. Just......
  • Blunt v. Lee, 2019 BCSC 351
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 14, 2019
    ...protects the integrity of the bargaining process: Rick at paras. 47. As summarized by Mr. Justice Pearlman in Kawana v. Shemal, 2011 BCSC 377 at para. 200, “[d]epending on the circumstances of each case, deliberate failure to make full disclosure may result in judicial intervention. The ext......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT