Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2001 NSSC 85
Judge | Gruchy, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
Case Date | June 13, 2001 |
Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
Citations | 2001 NSSC 85;(2001), 194 N.S.R.(2d) 290 (SC) |
Keating v. N.S. (A.G.) (2001), 194 N.S.R.(2d) 290 (SC);
606 A.P.R. 290
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2001] N.S.R.(2d) TBEd. JN.038
In The Matter Of an Appeal pursuant to Section 41 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.S. 1993, c. 5.
(S.H. No. 155707; 2001 NSSC 85)
Indexed As: Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General)
Nova Scotia Supreme Court
Gruchy, J.
June 13, 2001.
Summary:
The province commissioned an investigation into alleged abuse of youths in provincial youth correction and protection institutions. Keating, a retired employee at one of the institutions, learned of allegations of abuse made against him in the Alternative Disputes Resolution process undertaken to compensate abuse victims who proved their claims. Keating, who was being criminally investigated, applied under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act for disclosure of information pertaining to allegations against him. Disclosure was denied by the Coordinator. Keating appealed.
The Nova Scotia Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part. The court set out the information that had to be disclosed to Keating.
Crown - Topic 7170
Examination of public documents - Freedom of information - Legislation - Disclosure - Personal information - The province investigated alleged abuse in provincial youth correction and protection institutions - Victims were given a non-public forum to tell their stories and obtain compensation - Notwithstanding oral assurances of confidentiality, victims executed releases permitting the information to be used for, inter alia, employee discipline and the investigation of criminal charges - Keating, a retired employee, learned of allegations against him - Because of the releases, the information would ultimately have to be disclosed to Keating - Keating's request under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act for disclosure of information respecting alleged abuse by him was denied - The Nova Scotia Supreme Court ordered disclosure of the number and nature of allegations against Keating, the name of the claimants making the allegations (if they executed a release), the times and dates of the alleged incidents, the amount of any settlement or payout for actions attributed solely to Keating and whether any allegations were dismissed or unproven - The court rejected the following claimed grounds for nondisclosure: (1) harm to law enforcement; (2) financial or economic harm to the province; and (3) unreasonable invasion of a third party's privacy.
Crown - Topic 7171
Examination of public documents - Freedom of information - Legislation - Disclosure - Confidential information supplied by third party - [See Crown - Topic 7170 ].
Crown - Topic 7206
Examination of public documents - Freedom of information - Bars - Personal information - [See Crown - Topic 7170 ].
Crown - Topic 7207
Examination of public documents - Freedom of information - Bars - Confidentiality - [See Crown - Topic 7170 ].
Crown - Topic 7209
Examination of public documents - Freedom of information - Bars - Information re investigative techniques or harmful to law enforcement - [See Crown - Topic 7170 ].
Crown - Topic 7220.08
Examination of public documents - Freedom of information - Bars - Prejudice to governmental economic interests - [See Crown - Topic 7170 ].
Crown - Topic 7292
Examination of public documents - Freedom of information - Practice - Appeals - Section 42(1) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act provided for a de novo appeal from the decision of the Coordinator responsible for determining whether information was to be disclosed - The Nova Scotia Supreme Court stated, with respect to de novo appeals, that "the distinction between 'an appeal by holding a trial de novo' and an appeal to the provincial Court of Appeal is that although the object of both is to determine whether the decision appealed from was right or wrong, in the latter case the question is whether it was right or wrong having regard to the evidence upon which it was based, whereas in the former the issue is to be determined without any reference, except for purposes of cross-examination, to the evidence called in the Court appealed from and upon a fresh determination based upon evidence called anew and perhaps accompanied by entirely new evidence" - See paragraph 35.
Cases Noticed:
Jobb v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Justice) (1999), 174 N.S.R.(2d) 380; 532 A.P.R. 380 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 35].
R. v. Dennis (1960), 125 C.C.C. 321 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 35].
Dickie v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Health) (1999), 176 N.S.R.(2d) 333; 538 A.P.R. 333 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].
Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada et al. (2000), 190 N.S.R.(2d) 208; 594 A.P.R. 208 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 54].
Vancouver Police Board, Re, [1999] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 44 (Comm.), refd to. [para. 56].
Ontario (Minister of Culture and Communications), Re, [1993] O.I.P.C. No. 5, dist. [para. 61].
Ontario (Attorney General), Re, [1998] O.I.P.C. No. 188, refd to. [para. 61].
Statutes Noticed:
Children and Family Services Act, S.N.S. 1990, c. 5, sect. 63(3), sect. 63(4) [para. 57].
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.S. 1993, c. 5, sect. 2(a)(ii) [para. 61]; sect. 15(1), sect. 15(2), sect. 17(1)(e), sect. 20(1), sect. 20(2), sect. 20(3)(b), sect. 20(4) [para. 46]; sect. 41(1), sect. 41(2) [para. 24]; sect. 42(1) [para. 34]; sect. 45 [para. 61].
Counsel:
W. Dale Dunlop and Ken Mahoney, a/c, for Mr. Keating;
Edward A. Gores, for the Attorney General;
Anne S. Derrick, Q.C., for the third party (name not to be known).
This appeal was heard on January 29-30, 2001, at Halifax, N.S., before Gruchy, J., of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court, who delivered the following judgment on June 13, 2001.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Other Investigative Powers
...disclosed by a digital recording ammeter, and so no warrant of any type would be needed. 18 Keating v Nova Scotia (Attorney General ), 2001 NSSC 85. 19 R v Rayworth , [1999] OJ No 5289 (SCJ), aff’d without reference to this issue, [2001] OJ No 4111 (CA). 20 Criminal Code of Canada (Re) , 20......
-
Table of cases
...(HCJ)............................................................................... 57 Keating v Nova Scotia (Attorney General) (2001), 194 NSR (2d) 290, 42 Admin LR (3d) 66, 2001 NSSC 85 .......................................................... 219 Klippenstein v R, 2019 MBCA 13 ..............
-
Table of cases
...(H.C.J.) ......................................................................... 47 Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) (2001), 194 N.S.R. (2d) 290, 42 Admin. L.R. (3d) 66, 2001 NSSC 85 ...................................................... 136 Knox Contracting Ltd. v. Canada, [1990......
-
Table of cases
...(HCJ)............................................................................... 48 Keating v Nova Scotia (Attorney General) (2001), 194 NSR (2d) 290, 42 Admin LR (3d) 66, 2001 NSSC 85 .......................................................... 164 Knox Contracting Ltd v Canada, [1990] 2......
-
Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), (2001) 198 N.S.R.(2d) 110 (SC)
...against him. Disclosure was denied by the Coordinator. Keating appealed. The Nova Scotia Supreme Court, in a judgment reported 194 N.S.R.(2d) 290; 606 A.P.R. 290, allowed the appeal in part. The court set out the information that had to be disclosed to Keating. The parties subsequently made......
-
Monkman v. Director of Serious Incident Response Team, (2015) 367 N.S.R.(2d) 86 (SC)
...Service) (2014), 345 N.S.R.(2d) 149; 1092 A.P.R. 149; 2014 NSSC 183, refd to. [para. 31]. Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) (2001), 194 N.S.R.(2d) 290; 606 A.P.R. 290; 2001 NSSC 85, refd to. [para. Lavigne v. Commissioner of Official Languages (Can.) et al., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 773; 289......
-
MacDonald v. Cape Breton Regional Municipality,
...a trial de novo and this court is entitled to make a fresh determination on new evidence (see: Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2001 NSSC 85, Shannex Health Care Management Inc. v. Attorney General of Nova Scotia representing the Nova Scotia Department of Health, 2004 NSSC 54, and......
-
French v. Dalhousie University, (2002) 206 N.S.R.(2d) 203 (SC)
...Privacy Act, Re (1996), 152 N.S.R.(2d) 354; 442 A.P.R. 354 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 18]. Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) (2001), 194 N.S.R.(2d) 290; 606 A.P.R. 290 (S.C.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.S. 1995, c. 3, sec......
-
Other Investigative Powers
...disclosed by a digital recording ammeter, and so no warrant of any type would be needed. 18 Keating v Nova Scotia (Attorney General ), 2001 NSSC 85. 19 R v Rayworth , [1999] OJ No 5289 (SCJ), aff’d without reference to this issue, [2001] OJ No 4111 (CA). 20 Criminal Code of Canada (Re) , 20......
-
Table of cases
...(HCJ)............................................................................... 57 Keating v Nova Scotia (Attorney General) (2001), 194 NSR (2d) 290, 42 Admin LR (3d) 66, 2001 NSSC 85 .......................................................... 219 Klippenstein v R, 2019 MBCA 13 ..............
-
Table of cases
...(H.C.J.) ......................................................................... 47 Keating v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) (2001), 194 N.S.R. (2d) 290, 42 Admin. L.R. (3d) 66, 2001 NSSC 85 ...................................................... 136 Knox Contracting Ltd. v. Canada, [1990......
-
Table of cases
...(HCJ)............................................................................... 48 Keating v Nova Scotia (Attorney General) (2001), 194 NSR (2d) 290, 42 Admin LR (3d) 66, 2001 NSSC 85 .......................................................... 164 Knox Contracting Ltd v Canada, [1990] 2......