Kequahtooway v Saskatchewan (Government)
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Jackson, Ottenbreit and Whitmore |
| Citation | 2018 SKCA 68 |
| Docket Number | CACV2732 |
| Date | 24 August 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Banman v. Ontario
...2021 MBCA 34. [44] 2019 SCC 35. [45] 2019 FC 869. [46] 2018 ONSC 7545. [47] 2018 ONSC 5430. [48] 2018 ONSC 4008. [49] 2018 ONSC 3914. [50] 2018 SKCA 68. [51] 2018 NBCA 51, leave to appeal to S.C.C. ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. 415. [52] 2016 ONSC 7853. [53] 2016 ONSC 7836. [54] 2016 ONSC 5319. [55......
-
Digest: Kequahtooway v Saskatchewan (Government), 2018 SKCA 68
...as: 2018 SKCA 68 Docket Number: CACV 2732 , CA17178 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-08-18 Judges: Jackson Ottenbreit Whitmore Subjects: Civil Procedure � Class Actions � Certification � Appeal Digest: The appellant plaintiff appealed from the decision of a Queen�s Bench judge that refused......
-
Evans v. General Motors of Canada Company
...and, conversely, defects in substance may raise questions about the procedure: similarly, see Kequahtooway v Saskatchewan (Government), 2018 SKCA 68 at paras 49–50, 426 DLR (4th) 95. [72] Fischer also offers a number of questions for use in this analysis: (a) “What are the barriers to acces......
-
Walker v. Hunter
...on which it was based. At paragraph 34 of the Fiat, she referred to this Court’s decision in Kequahtooway v Saskatchewan (Government), 2018 SKCA 68 at para 35, 426 DLR (4th) 95 [Kequahtooway], as authority for the proposition that “the common law doctrine of fraudulent concealment … is an e......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
Banman v. Ontario
...2021 MBCA 34. [44] 2019 SCC 35. [45] 2019 FC 869. [46] 2018 ONSC 7545. [47] 2018 ONSC 5430. [48] 2018 ONSC 4008. [49] 2018 ONSC 3914. [50] 2018 SKCA 68. [51] 2018 NBCA 51, leave to appeal to S.C.C. ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. 415. [52] 2016 ONSC 7853. [53] 2016 ONSC 7836. [54] 2016 ONSC 5319. [55......
-
Popp v. Canada (Attorney General)
...In Kequahtooway v Saskatchewan (Government), 2018 SKCA 68, 426 DLR (4th) 95, at para 51, the Court of Appeal referred to Slark v Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726, 6 CPC (7th) [51] … In Slark, Cullity J. held that a class action was the best way to pursue access......
-
T.G. v Government of Saskatchewan
...In Kequahtooway v Saskatchewan (Government), 2018 SKCA 68, 426 DLR (4th) 95 [Kequahtooway], the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan discussed, among other things, the preferability criterion. That appeal involved a certification judge’s refusal to certify a class action alleging institu......
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Kequahtooway v Saskatchewan (Government), 2018 SKCA 68
...as: 2018 SKCA 68 Docket Number: CACV 2732 , CA17178 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-08-18 Judges: Jackson Ottenbreit Whitmore Subjects: Civil Procedure � Class Actions � Certification � Appeal Digest: The appellant plaintiff appealed from the decision of a Queen�s Bench judge that refused......