Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2020 FC 202
Date05 February 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Su v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 366
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 17 Marzo 2022
    ...is well-settled by this Court and, by the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal: see Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202 [per Roussel J] at para 7, citing Kisana v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FCA 189 [per Nadon JA] at para 45 and Owusu v Canada (M......
  • Elshafi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 266
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 24 Febrero 2023
    ...were affected by the lack of permanent status in Canada, and that they failed to do so: Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202 at para 7; Hamoush v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1136 at para 16. [40] The cases cited by the Respondent are distinguishable on ......
  • Syed v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 398
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 23 Marzo 2022
    ...to healthcare and an education. [28] I find the reasoning of my colleague Justice Roussel in Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202 to be applicable to the matter at hand: [18] The Officer’s reasons reflect the submissions and the evidence before her. The Officer ac......
  • Hamoush v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1136
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 28 Julio 2022
    ...law (Vavilov at paras 85-86, citing Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 at para 47). [12] In Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202 [Khan], Justice Sylvie Roussel reiterated that an H&C exemption is an exceptional and discretionary remedy, and the onus of establishing......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Su v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 366
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 17 Marzo 2022
    ...is well-settled by this Court and, by the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal: see Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202 [per Roussel J] at para 7, citing Kisana v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FCA 189 [per Nadon JA] at para 45 and Owusu v Canada (M......
  • Elshafi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 266
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 24 Febrero 2023
    ...were affected by the lack of permanent status in Canada, and that they failed to do so: Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202 at para 7; Hamoush v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1136 at para 16. [40] The cases cited by the Respondent are distinguishable on ......
  • Syed v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 398
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 23 Marzo 2022
    ...to healthcare and an education. [28] I find the reasoning of my colleague Justice Roussel in Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202 to be applicable to the matter at hand: [18] The Officer’s reasons reflect the submissions and the evidence before her. The Officer ac......
  • Hamoush v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1136
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 28 Julio 2022
    ...law (Vavilov at paras 85-86, citing Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 at para 47). [12] In Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202 [Khan], Justice Sylvie Roussel reiterated that an H&C exemption is an exceptional and discretionary remedy, and the onus of establishing......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT