Khir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 18 February 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
A.R. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1028
...[27] The standard of review for the SDM’s substantive decision is reasonableness: Khir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160, at para 27; Hangero v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1727, at para [28] Reasonableness review is a deferential and disciplined ev......
-
Nguyen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1617
...basis of that evidence, which further demonstrates that the decision was unreasonable (citing Khir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160 at paras 40, 49 [23] I agree with the Applicants. [24] On the issue of her job and hourly wage offered, an LMIA had been approved and the pr......
-
Shah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 424
...also Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 at para 44 [Kanthasamy]; Khir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160 at para 27). I should also mention that an H&C exemption under subsection 25(1) of the Act is an exceptional and highly discretionary rem......
-
Cervenakova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...and Immigration), 2001 FCA 331 (Evans JA), at paras 7 and 9-11. See my discussion in Khir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160, at paras 36-50. [45] In my view, the officer did not reach an untenable conclusion or fundamentally misapprehend the evidence in this case. As has b......
Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
-
A.R. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1028
...[27] The standard of review for the SDM’s substantive decision is reasonableness: Khir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160, at para 27; Hangero v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1727, at para [28] Reasonableness review is a deferential and disciplined ev......
-
Shah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 424
...also Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 at para 44 [Kanthasamy]; Khir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160 at para 27). I should also mention that an H&C exemption under subsection 25(1) of the Act is an exceptional and highly discretionary rem......
-
Agudo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 320
...to the assessment of critical facts that may (or may not) constrain a decision maker: see Khir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160, at paras 37-49. The question then is whether the judicial review principles in Vavilov would tolerate an exemption for country condition eviden......
-
Cervenakova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...and Immigration), 2001 FCA 331 (Evans JA), at paras 7 and 9-11. See my discussion in Khir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160, at paras 36-50. [45] In my view, the officer did not reach an untenable conclusion or fundamentally misapprehend the evidence in this case. As has b......
Request a trial to view additional results