Kidd v. Flad et al., [2007] Sask.R. Uned. 104 (CA)
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Cameron, J.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE |
Citation | [2007] Sask.R. Uned. 104 (CA),[2007] Sask.R. Uned. 104,2007 SKCA 130 |
Date | 14 November 2007 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Digest: Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation v Saskatchewan, 2018 SKCA 90
...Court of Appeal Act, 2000, SS 2000, c C-42.1, s 8(1) Rules Considered: QB Rule 3-72 QB Rule 3-72(1)(c)(i) Cases Considered: Kidd v Flad, 2007 SKCA 130 Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SKCA 124, 485 Sask R 162 Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation v Canada (Attorney Gene......
-
Kashuba v Wilton (Rural Municipality),
...and discretionary, [and] there would be a high standard of appellate review applicable” (at para 11). See also, Kidd v Flad, 2007 SKCA 130 at para 3. [55] I also see no importance to an appeal on this issue. Whatever the intent may be behind ......
-
Global Aerospace Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania et al., 2009 SKQB 111
...refd to. [para. 22]. Kidd v. Flad et al., [2007] Sask.R. Uned. 156; 2007 SKQB 372, leave to appeal denied, [2007] Sask.R. Uned. 104; 2007 SKCA 130, refd to. [para. MacPherson Engineering Inc. v. Regina (City) et al. (2008), 314 Sask.R. 182; 435 W.A.C. 182; 2008 SKCA 144, refd to. [para. 25]......
-
Harvey et al. v. Western Canada Lottery Corp., 2015 SKCA 75
...[2009] 4 W.W.R. 505; 314 Sask.R. 175; 435 W.A.C. 175; 2008 SKCA 146, refd to. [para. 7]. Kidd v. Flad et al., [2007] Sask.R. Uned. 104; 2007 SKCA 130, refd to. [para. Cameco Corp. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania et al., [2008] 6 W.W.R. 626; 310 Sask.R. 89; 423 W.A.C. 89; 2008 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Kashuba v Wilton (Rural Municipality),
...and discretionary, [and] there would be a high standard of appellate review applicable” (at para 11). See also, Kidd v Flad, 2007 SKCA 130 at para 3. [55] I also see no importance to an appeal on this issue. Whatever the intent may be behind ......
-
Global Aerospace Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania et al., 2009 SKQB 111
...refd to. [para. 22]. Kidd v. Flad et al., [2007] Sask.R. Uned. 156; 2007 SKQB 372, leave to appeal denied, [2007] Sask.R. Uned. 104; 2007 SKCA 130, refd to. [para. MacPherson Engineering Inc. v. Regina (City) et al. (2008), 314 Sask.R. 182; 435 W.A.C. 182; 2008 SKCA 144, refd to. [para. 25]......
-
Harvey et al. v. Western Canada Lottery Corp., 2015 SKCA 75
...[2009] 4 W.W.R. 505; 314 Sask.R. 175; 435 W.A.C. 175; 2008 SKCA 146, refd to. [para. 7]. Kidd v. Flad et al., [2007] Sask.R. Uned. 104; 2007 SKCA 130, refd to. [para. Cameco Corp. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania et al., [2008] 6 W.W.R. 626; 310 Sask.R. 89; 423 W.A.C. 89; 2008 ......
-
Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation v Saskatchewan, 2018 SKCA 90
...therefore, PBCN has properly sought leave to appeal against it (The Court of Appeal Act, 2000, SS 2000, c C-42.1, s 8(1); Kidd v Flad, 2007 SKCA 130). [3] The QB Fiat results from the exercise of judicial discretion under Rule 3-72(1)(c)(i) of The Queen’s Bench Rules, which allows a party t......
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation v Saskatchewan, 2018 SKCA 90
...Court of Appeal Act, 2000, SS 2000, c C-42.1, s 8(1) Rules Considered: QB Rule 3-72 QB Rule 3-72(1)(c)(i) Cases Considered: Kidd v Flad, 2007 SKCA 130 Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SKCA 124, 485 Sask R 162 Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation v Canada (Attorney Gene......