Kim v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2019 FC 526
Date25 April 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Idowu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 46
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 17, 2022
    ...Kaur v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 572 at para 13; Kim v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526 at para 11; Ofori v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 212 at para 14; Brown v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immi......
  • Dunkley v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 892
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 14, 2022
    ...that the Program Delivery Instructions are a mandatory precondition to be eligible for a PGWP (Kim v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526 at para 11; see also Ofori v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 212 at para 20; Saggu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 202......
  • Verma v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1167
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 4, 2022
    ...(Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 509 at para 26. [Emphasis added] [25] At paragraph 9 of Kim v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526, my colleague Justice Norris affirms the findings in Marsh and cites this Court’s summary of the applicable principles of procedural ......
  • Saloni v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 20, 2021
    ...Marsh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 408 (Russell J.), at paras 33-35; and Kim v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526 (Norris J.), at para 9. [41] In this case, the applicant was required to satisfy the officer that she was eligible for the PGWP. She did not do......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Idowu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 46
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 17, 2022
    ...Kaur v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 572 at para 13; Kim v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526 at para 11; Ofori v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 212 at para 14; Brown v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immi......
  • Dunkley v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 892
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 14, 2022
    ...that the Program Delivery Instructions are a mandatory precondition to be eligible for a PGWP (Kim v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526 at para 11; see also Ofori v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 212 at para 20; Saggu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 202......
  • Verma v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1167
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 4, 2022
    ...(Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 509 at para 26. [Emphasis added] [25] At paragraph 9 of Kim v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526, my colleague Justice Norris affirms the findings in Marsh and cites this Court’s summary of the applicable principles of procedural ......
  • Saloni v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 20, 2021
    ...Marsh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 408 (Russell J.), at paras 33-35; and Kim v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526 (Norris J.), at para 9. [41] In this case, the applicant was required to satisfy the officer that she was eligible for the PGWP. She did not do......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT