Kina et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 105
Judge | Russell, J. |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Case Date | March 21, 2014 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 105;[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 105 (FC);2014 FC 284 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Tar v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 321 (FC)
...evidence is, in my view, inadequate and unreasonable for the reasons I set out in Kina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 284. [80] I also believe the Board committed a reviewable error when it treated the situation as being one of "domestic violence." Clearly, the Applicants ......
-
Szalai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 972
...of correctness (Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1004 at para 22; Kina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 284 at para 24). A conclusion will not be rational or defensible if the decision-maker has failed to carry out the proper analysis (Lake v Canada (Mini......
-
A.B. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1339
...correctness (Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1004 at para 22 [Ruszo]; Kina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 284 at para 24; Kaneza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 231 at para 25). A conclusion will not be rational or defensible if the dec......
-
St. Croix v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 461
...the correct test (Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1004 at para 22; Kina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 284 at para 24). [9] It is implicit in the reasonableness standard that this Court shows deference to the RPD’s credibility findings (Su v Canada (Ci......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
Tar v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 321 (FC)
...evidence is, in my view, inadequate and unreasonable for the reasons I set out in Kina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 284. [80] I also believe the Board committed a reviewable error when it treated the situation as being one of "domestic violence." Clearly, the Applicants ......
-
Szalai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 972
...of correctness (Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1004 at para 22; Kina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 284 at para 24). A conclusion will not be rational or defensible if the decision-maker has failed to carry out the proper analysis (Lake v Canada (Mini......
-
A.B. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1339
...correctness (Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1004 at para 22 [Ruszo]; Kina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 284 at para 24; Kaneza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 231 at para 25). A conclusion will not be rational or defensible if the dec......
-
St. Croix v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 461
...the correct test (Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1004 at para 22; Kina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 284 at para 24). [9] It is implicit in the reasonableness standard that this Court shows deference to the RPD’s credibility findings (Su v Canada (Ci......
Request a trial to view additional results