Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | SANFILIPPO J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 6748 |
| Docket Number | CV-18-610299 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 03 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2021 ONSC 964
...under Rule 39.02 (the “Evidentiary Leave Motion”): Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 (the “Decision”). [2] In paras. 97 and 98 of the Decision, I encouraged the p......
-
Wilds v 1959612 Ontario Inc.,
...a trial. See Sanzone v. Schechter, 2016 ONCA 566 at para. 30 (“ Sanzone”) and Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 at para. 40 Each party must put its best foot forward to establish whether or not there is a genuine issue requiring a trial: see Ramdial ......
-
RNC Corp. v. Johnstone, 2020 ONSC 7751
...motion, the court can direct how the burdens of proof will interact. [25] In Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 (CanLII) my colleague Sanfilippo J. expressed the point this [37] When a limitation defence is raised, the onus rests with Kinectrics, as p......
-
Eleoff v Adamczyk,
...a trial. See Sanzone v. Schechter, 2016 ONCA 566 at para. 30 (“ Sanzone”) and Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 at para. 75 Each party must put its best foot forward to establish whether or not there is a genuine issue requiring a trial: see Ramdial ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2021 ONSC 964
...under Rule 39.02 (the “Evidentiary Leave Motion”): Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 (the “Decision”). [2] In paras. 97 and 98 of the Decision, I encouraged the p......
-
Wilds v 1959612 Ontario Inc.,
...a trial. See Sanzone v. Schechter, 2016 ONCA 566 at para. 30 (“ Sanzone”) and Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 at para. 40 Each party must put its best foot forward to establish whether or not there is a genuine issue requiring a trial: see Ramdial ......
-
RNC Corp. v. Johnstone, 2020 ONSC 7751
...motion, the court can direct how the burdens of proof will interact. [25] In Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 (CanLII) my colleague Sanfilippo J. expressed the point this [37] When a limitation defence is raised, the onus rests with Kinectrics, as p......
-
Eleoff v Adamczyk,
...a trial. See Sanzone v. Schechter, 2016 ONCA 566 at para. 30 (“ Sanzone”) and Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 at para. 75 Each party must put its best foot forward to establish whether or not there is a genuine issue requiring a trial: see Ramdial ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Kinectrics V. FCL Fisker Et Al.: Novel Limitation Period Arguments For Subrogation Insurers
...team successfully opposed a motion for summary judgment recently, reported at Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748. In that decision, Justice Sanfilippo recognized that different limitation periods can apply to different causes of action, such that a neglig......