Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | SANFILIPPO J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 6748 |
| Docket Number | CV-18-610299 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 03 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc.,
...under Rule 39.02 (the “Evidentiary Leave Motion”): Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 (the “Decision”). [2] In paras. 97 and 98 of the Decision, I encouraged the p......
-
RNC Corp. v. Johnstone, 2020 ONSC 7751
...motion, the court can direct how the burdens of proof will interact. [25] In Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 (CanLII) my colleague Sanfilippo J. expressed the point this [37] When a limitation defence is raised, the onus rests with Kinectrics, as p......
-
Holland v. Toronto Police Services Board,
...See Sanzone v. Schechter, 2016 ONCA 566 at paras. 24, 30, 32-33 and Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 at paras. 33-35. These principles apply to motions for summary judgment based on a limitation period defence: see Crombie Property Holdings Li......
-
Sabaratnam v. Mooka,
...of establishing that there is no genuine issue requiring trial. See Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 at para. [66] The Defendants argue that the Plaintiff has not stated clearly in hi......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc.,
...under Rule 39.02 (the “Evidentiary Leave Motion”): Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 (the “Decision”). [2] In paras. 97 and 98 of the Decision, I encouraged the p......
-
RNC Corp. v. Johnstone, 2020 ONSC 7751
...motion, the court can direct how the burdens of proof will interact. [25] In Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 (CanLII) my colleague Sanfilippo J. expressed the point this [37] When a limitation defence is raised, the onus rests with Kinectrics, as p......
-
Holland v. Toronto Police Services Board,
...See Sanzone v. Schechter, 2016 ONCA 566 at paras. 24, 30, 32-33 and Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 at paras. 33-35. These principles apply to motions for summary judgment based on a limitation period defence: see Crombie Property Holdings Li......
-
Sabaratnam v. Mooka,
...of establishing that there is no genuine issue requiring trial. See Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748 at para. [66] The Defendants argue that the Plaintiff has not stated clearly in hi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Kinectrics V. FCL Fisker Et Al.: Novel Limitation Period Arguments For Subrogation Insurers
...team successfully opposed a motion for summary judgment recently, reported at Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748. In that decision, Justice Sanfilippo recognized that different limitation periods can apply to different causes of action, such that a neglig......